Teams

Over the Hill Gang - Martinez/IS

2026 TUL MIXED 55 & Over League · 7.0 MIXED

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-16vs Nichols/PH 55s 7.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesBrian Conway / Jennifer Hartfelder vs Ky Nichols / Theresa Nichols6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesScott Hartfelder / Barb Evans vs CHRISTOPHER DICKASON / Ann Stone1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesScott Thomas / Shelley Bradshaw vs Jim Vanderveen / Dana Burd4-6, 2-6
2026-08-14vs Williams/PH 55s 7.0XLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrian Conway / Jennifer Hartfelder vs Scott Hjelm / Henri Sabin3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLynn Fesperman / Shelley Bradshaw vs Stephanie Loseke / Kevin Sabin2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGeorge Martinez / Sandy Stoner vs Steven Henry / Kathy Alexander2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-08-07vs Mullenix 55s 7.0X/LFWon 30
W#1 DoublesScott Thomas / Shelley Bradshaw vs Gloria Mullenix / Jeremy Brunk6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLynn Fesperman / Jennifer Hartfelder vs Vanessa Hutto / James Hayward7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJohn Holcomb / Barb Evans vs Karin Duke / Chuck Clark6-2, 6-1
2026-08-02vs Elias/GR Mixed 55s 7.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesScott Hartfelder / Barb Evans vs Michael Abboud / Tracie Wilson7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLynn Fesperman / Tambra Conway vs Ken Pelotte / Tracie Pelotte6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBrian Conway / Jennifer Hartfelder vs David Schmidt / Cynthia Elias6-1, 6-0
2026-07-12vs Penn 55s 7.0/PHWon 21
L#1 DoublesGeorge Martinez / Shelley Bradshaw vs John Lee / Stefanie Lee6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesScott Thomas / Sandy Stoner vs Chris Moody / Tina Moody1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesScott Hartfelder / Barb Evans vs Andrew Townsend / Marilynda Kuehn6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 7.0 MIXED
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Over the Hill Gang - Martinez/IS3193983
2Nichols/PH 55s 7.02051440
3Williams/PH 55s 7.0X2163964
4Kimbrough/IS 55s 7.0X1133861
5Penn 55s 7.0/PH12451285
6Mullenix 55s 7.0X/LF133919126
7Elias/GR Mixed 55s 7.002061270

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Brian Conway
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.54
John Holcomb
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Scott Hartfelder
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Lynn Fesperman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
George Martinez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.09
Tambra Conway
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Sandy Stoner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
Shelley Bradshaw
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.87
Barb Evans
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Jeanna Holcomb
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Jennifer Hartfelder
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Scott Thomas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Conway + Sandy Stoner9166% games+19.2% vs expected
George Martinez + Sandy Stoner3644% games−8.8% vs expected
Scott Hartfelder + Shelley Bradshaw3447% gamesnot enough data
Scott Hartfelder + Sandy Stoner3255% gamesnot enough data
Shelley Bradshaw + George Martinez2345% gamesnot enough data
Scott Thomas + Jennifer Hartfelder224 matchesnot enough data
Barb Evans + Brian Conway314 matchesnot enough data
Scott Hartfelder + Barb Evans213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brian Conway
127W–50L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
John Holcomb
33W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.54
Scott Hartfelder
127W–87L career · 3 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
3.46
Lynn Fesperman
65W–81L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
George Martinez
80W–78L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
Tambra Conway
58W–59L career · 1 line in 2026
26%73%<1%
3.09
Sandy Stoner
70W–96L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.01
Shelley Bradshaw
101W–140L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.92
3
Barb Evans
145W–117L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.87
Jeanna Holcomb
59W–64L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Jennifer Hartfelder
67W–77L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Scott Thomas
49W–47L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.