Teams

BBTL60/Kearns/SunCity

Fall 60 & Over - BBTL · Women 3.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-11-13vs BBTL60/Geiman/TLCLost 03
L#1 DoublesJodi Manello / Kim Payne vs Deborah Fisher / Sharon Geiman2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Amedei / Sherri Klug vs Amy Friedman / Nancy Weaver6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLori Clark / Vivian Tom vs Gale Brown / Jayne Jones6-7, 0-6
2025-10-23vs BBTL60/Turino/Sun CityLost 12
L#1 DoublesVivian Tom / Jodi Manello vs Kristen Turino / Lydia Costa4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDonna Kearns / Diane Amedei vs Jane Olthuis / Lee Delieto6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesFrankie Nixon / Elaine Alexander vs Patricia Niarchos / Sue Quinn6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-10-02vs BBTL60/Mosse/SunCityWon 21
W#1 DoublesKim Payne / Jodi Manello vs Maria LeBeau / Jill Mosse6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDonna Kearns / Diane Amedei vs April Ringheiser / Kathryn Stupple6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Young / Betsy Robinson vs Debbie Venedam / Melinda Young4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Frankie Nixon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Jodi Manello
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Diane Amedei
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Sherri Klug
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Donna Kearns
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
Betsy Robinson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Elaine Alexander
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.42
Vivian Tom
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kim Payne
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Kearns + Elaine Alexander033 matchesnot enough data
Donna Kearns + Sherri Klug123 matchesnot enough data
Donna Kearns + Frankie Nixon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Frankie Nixon
12W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
Jodi Manello
9W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Diane Amedei
12W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
Sherri Klug
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Donna Kearns
12W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.61
3
Betsy Robinson
4W–19L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.57
3
Elaine Alexander
1W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.54
Vivian Tom
4W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.42
Kim Payne
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.