Teams

DWest (Park Road)

2025 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 5.0 Women - Sat PM

13 players · average NTRP 4.81 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-05-17vs DThayaprasat (Park Road)Split 11
L#1 DoublesMeghan Bartholomew / Samantha Danesis vs Annabella Bonadonna Ayala - (DQ) / Sanjana Sudhir3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesToni Laney / Cassandra Wincek vs Carson Rose Tennyson / Darri Thayaprasat6-1, 6-2
2025-05-10vs DThayaprasat (Park Road)Won 21
L#1 DoublesCallie Schmit / Diana West vs Kindell Schmitt / Lauren Laughton4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesCassandra Wincek vs Laine Parker Horvath7-6, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMeghan Bartholomew / Samantha Danesis vs Sarah Cimmino / Darri Thayaprasat4-6, 2-2
2025-04-21vs DThayaprasat (Park Road)Split 11
L#1 DoublesMeghan Bartholomew / Perri Freel vs Hannah English Rahill / Carson Rose Tennyson6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesSamantha Danesis vs Darri Thayaprasat6-0, 3-0
2025-04-12vs DThayaprasat (Park Road)Split 11
L#1 DoublesNatalie Ivanov / Perri Freel vs Brittney Desmond / Sanjana Sudhir0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCallie Schmit / Diana West vs Laine Parker Horvath / Brittany Simpson6-3, 6-4
2025-04-05vs DThayaprasat (Park Road)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSamantha Danesis / Jessica Mauney vs Abbey Neff / Carling Deehr4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCallie Schmit / MAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY vs Lauren Laughton / Sanjana Sudhir6-7, 3-6
2025-03-29vs DThayaprasat (Park Road)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSamantha Danesis / Cassandra Wincek vs Abbey Neff / Lindsey Stuckey2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDiana West / Toni Laney vs Brittany Simpson / Carson Rose Tennyson4-6, 5-7
2025-03-22vs DThayaprasat (Park Road)Split 11
L#1 DoublesMeghan Bartholomew / Cassandra Wincek vs Annabella Bonadonna Ayala - (DQ) / Mary McGehee0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSamantha Danesis / Perri Freel vs Hannah English Rahill / Lauren Laughton6-4, 6-4
2025-03-15vs DThayaprasat (Park Road)Split 11
W#1 DoublesCallie Schmit / Toni Laney vs Abbey Neff / Lindsey Stuckey7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDiana West / Samantha Danesis vs Hannah English Rahill / Carling Deehr7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-08vs DThayaprasat (Park Road)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesNatalie Ivanov / Cassandra Wincek vs Annabella Bonadonna Ayala - (DQ) / Mary McGehee1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSamantha Danesis / Meghan Bartholomew vs Sarah Cimmino / Kindell Schmitt2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 5.0 Women - Sat PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.53 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.71
Natalie Ivanov
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.65
Juliana Marques
published
4.61
Samantha Danesis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 5
4.60
Meghan Bartholomew
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 5
4.58
Callie Schmit
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.58
Toni Laney
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4.5
4.55
Cassandra Wincek
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 5
4.51
Perri Freel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.39
MAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.33
Jessica Mauney
published
4.28
Diana West
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Lela Thompson
published
Morgan Valentine
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natalie Ivanov + Samantha Danesis8355% games+4.4% vs expected
Meghan Bartholomew + Samantha Danesis14658% games+3.7% vs expected
Natalie Ivanov + Callie Schmit6162% games+2.5% vs expected
Natalie Ivanov + Toni Laney13357% games−0.1% vs expected
Callie Schmit + Toni Laney4156% gamesnot enough data
Toni Laney + Samantha Danesis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Natalie Ivanov
38W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
4.71
Juliana Marques
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
4.65
5
Samantha Danesis
111W–53L career · 8 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
4.61
5
Meghan Bartholomew
66W–46L career · 10 lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
4.60
5
Callie Schmit
60W–41L career · 9 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
4.58
4.5
Toni Laney
173W–51L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
4.58
5
Cassandra Wincek
102W–29L career · 10 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.55
Perri Freel
67W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
4.51
4.5
MAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY
46W–31L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
4.39
Jessica Mauney
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
4.33
4.5
Diana West
34W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
4.28
Lela Thompson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Morgan Valentine
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.