Teams

MPTC - Fain

**2026 Team Combo · Ladies 9.5

6 players · average NTRP 4.67 / TEXAS

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Ladies 9.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.43 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.65
4.58
Crystal Fain
published 5
4.54
Emily Kha
published 4.5
4.54
Shelby Fillingame
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.32
Alex Kornajcik
published 4.5
3.97
Kimberly Elliott
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alex Kornajcik + Crystal Fain19266% games+6.6% vs expected
Alex Kornajcik + Emily Kha6066% games+6.4% vs expected
Kimberly Elliott + Crystal Fain10457% games+2.4% vs expected
Kimberly Elliott + Marissa Valentine-King303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marissa Valentine-King
167W–64L career · no lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
4.65
5
Crystal Fain
60W–30L career · no lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
4.58
4.5
Emily Kha
18W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
4.54
Shelby Fillingame
66W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
4.54
4.5
Alex Kornajcik
62W–14L career · no lines in 2026
1%91%8%
4.32
Kimberly Elliott
176W–56L career · no lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.