Teams

HCC Overhead Squad 40+

2024 Hillsborough Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 40 and Over

14 players · average NTRP 3.62 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-03-17vs Buckhorn I'd Hit That - J. TorresWon 20
W#1 DoublesGvozden Dokic / Nelci Rodrigues vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSimon Amesbury / Roxanne Ross vs Jon Brown / Amy Breck6-3, 6-2
2024-02-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesRoxanne Ross / Marcelino Velez vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-01-28vs Hunters Green - E. VickersLost 01
L#3 DoublesRoxanne Ross / Ray Gonzalez vs Leslie Herrion / Patrick Rairigh1-6, 4-6
2024-01-21vs Buckhorn I'd Hit That - J. TorresWon 10
W#2 DoublesNelci Rodrigues / Ray Gonzalez vs Edward Colihan / Dang Williamson2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-01-14vs Hills/Helme/40&Over7.0MXDLost 01
L#3 DoublesGvozden Dokic / Roxanne Ross vs Richard Helme / Tobey Hartigan3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 40 and Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Monica Barkett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.43
Ken Chin
published
3.36
Deborah Bianchi
published 3.5
3.35
Nelci Rodrigues
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Michael Palmer
published
3.27
Kelly Moore
published
3.26
Yenny Velez
published
Bill McLendon
published 3.5
3.18
Haley Dowlen
published
3.10
Kristen Shinners
published
3.04
Roxanne Ross
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Gvozden Dokic
published
Ray Gonzalez
published
WAYNE SMITH
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ken Chin + Yenny Velez2343% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Monica Barkett
239W–135L career · 1 line in 2024
1%90%8%
3.81
Ken Chin
21W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Deborah Bianchi
14W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Nelci Rodrigues
200W–129L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
Michael Palmer
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Kelly Moore
21W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.27
Yenny Velez
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Bill McLendon
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Haley Dowlen
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Kristen Shinners
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.10
Roxanne Ross
59W–101L career · 4 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.04
Gvozden Dokic
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ray Gonzalez
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
WAYNE SMITH
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.