Teams

QRRC-Crespo

2026 OH OV SUMMER Mixed 18&O Dayton · 2026 MXD 18&O 9.0 Dayton

17 players · average NTRP 4.50 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-17vs KTC-HallSplit 11
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Peyton / David Peyton vs Michael Hall / Maria Way2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMarguerite Shope / Luke Trubee vs Lauren Hawley / Samuel Garay7-5, 6-3
2026-07-10vs KTC-HallLost 01
L#1 DoublesLuke Trubee / Jessica Haney vs Andrew Knutson / Arian McNeil2-6, 0-6
2026-06-27vs KTC-HallLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlexander Boardman / Mari Ishida vs Nicholas Quiroz / Jenna Hagood4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLuke Hoban / Michelle Henley vs Andrew Knutson / Arian McNeil0-6, 2-6
2026-06-12vs KTC-HallLost 12
W#1 DoublesDavid Peyton / Taylor Pritt vs Michael Hall / Anthea Bush6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMarguerite Shope / Scott Shope vs Maria Way / Andrew Knutson0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMara Sheley / Jorge Crespo vs Reid Wynkoop / Miranda Riggs3-6, 3-6
2026-06-05vs KTC-HallLost 12
L#1 DoublesMari Ishida / Alexander Boardman vs Michael Hall / Jenna Hagood5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJessica Haney / Patrick Hagan vs Lauren Hawley / Nicholas Quiroz3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichelle Henley / Luke Trubee vs Maria Way / Reid Wynkoop2-6, 2-6
2026-05-22vs KTC-HallLost 03
L#1 DoublesConrad Klank / Elizabeth Peyton vs Michael Hall / Sarah Hall6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLuke Hoban / Michelle Henley vs Lauren Hawley / Nicholas Quiroz4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDonovan Christman / Rachel Hawley vs Samuel Garay / Miranda Riggs1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 MXD 18&O 9.0 Dayton have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.19 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.66
Mara Sheley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.47
Donovan Christman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.43
Scott Shope
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.42
David Peyton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.38
Luke Hoban
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.35
Taylor Pritt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.26
Alexander Boardman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.11
Conrad Klank
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.10
Luke Trubee
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
4.05
Elizabeth Peyton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.96
Jessica Haney
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.95
Mari Ishida
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.79
Rachel Hawley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Jorge Crespo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Marguerite Shope
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Michelle Henley
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Patrick Hagan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Luke Trubee + Jessica Haney7358% games+11.5% vs expected
Mari Ishida + Jorge Crespo1437% gamesnot enough data
Luke Hoban + Michelle Henley1442% gamesnot enough data
Mari Ishida + Luke Trubee314 matchesnot enough data
Donovan Christman + Rachel Hawley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mara Sheley
40W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.66
Donovan Christman
97W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%59%41%
4.47
Scott Shope
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%69%31%
4.43
4.5
David Peyton
62W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
4.42
Luke Hoban
75W–47L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
4.38
Taylor Pritt
23W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.35
4.5
Alexander Boardman
93W–47L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Conrad Klank
38W–52L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%77%<1%
4.11
Luke Trubee
101W–25L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
4.10
Elizabeth Peyton
32W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
4.05
Jessica Haney
61W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.96
Mari Ishida
103W–50L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.95
Rachel Hawley
29W–36L career · 1 line in 2026
93%7%<1%
3.79
Jorge Crespo
38W–67L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Marguerite Shope
7W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michelle Henley
10W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Patrick Hagan
11W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.