Teams

Cathy & Willy

2022 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.69 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-11-21vs Point of no ReturnWon 21
W#1 DoublesPenny Rohacek / Matthew Hemry vs Sen Tan / Jessie Lief3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAllison Erickson / Willy Stone vs Paul Wilcox / Christine Fagerstrom6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAracelis Bell / Marco Terracciano vs Dane Markell / Jennifer Duclos6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2021-11-07vs We got game!Won 30
W#1 DoublesAllison Erickson / Marco Terracciano vs Christy Lee / Michael Leonard6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCatherine Stone / Chris Love vs Conita Mullett / Mitchell Roth6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPenny Rohacek / Matthew Hemry vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-10-24vs ClendanielsLost 12
W#1 DoublesPenny Rohacek / Matthew Hemry vs Zareena Clendaniel / Krisada Meephothong6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesWilly Stone / Aracelis Bell vs Ryan Jaramillo / Nancy Scheetz-Freymiller4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCatherine Stone / Chris Love vs Allen Clendaniel / Dolores Alley2-6, 5-7
2021-10-24vs A TeamLost 12
W#1 DoublesCurtis Nelson / Penny Rohacek vs Jeremy Conkling / Angelina Salvato6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesWilly Stone / Aracelis Bell vs Adam Choi / Marlys Morton4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCatherine Stone / Chris Love vs Anthony Brooks / Triin Minton3-6, 2-6
2021-10-17vs ClendanielsWon 30
W#1 DoublesAllison Erickson / Willy Stone vs April Korshin / Richard Clendaniel6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAracelis Bell / Marco Terracciano vs Nancy Scheetz-Freymiller / Ryan Jaramillo6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPenny Rohacek / Matthew Hemry vs Dolores Alley / William Cotton3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-10-03vs Point of no ReturnSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAllison Erickson / Marco Terracciano vs Dane Markell / Jennifer Duclos6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesPenny Rohacek / Curtis Nelson vs Donna Newman / Preecha Pongphai4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Point of no Return5112616130
2Clendaniels4211716144
3Cathy & Willy3311716143
4A Team3311716126
5We got game!0601836218

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Catherine Stone
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.99
Allison Erickson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
Matthew Hemry
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.67
Curtis Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.65
Marco Terracciano
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
Chris Love
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.87
Willy Stone
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.67
Penny Rohacek
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Aracelis Bell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Stone + Willy Stone21858% games+13.8% vs expected
Marco Terracciano + Aracelis Bell3354% games+3.0% vs expected
Curtis Nelson + Penny Rohacek6555% gamesnot enough data
Willy Stone + Aracelis Bell3350% gamesnot enough data
Allison Erickson + Willy Stone303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Catherine Stone
189W–51L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
4.02
4
Allison Erickson
166W–36L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.99
4
Matthew Hemry
44W–34L career · type S · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Curtis Nelson
72W–65L career · 5 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Marco Terracciano
67W–44L career · 8 lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Chris Love
3W–18L career · type T · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Willy Stone
110W–70L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Penny Rohacek
49W–47L career · 6 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
0
Aracelis Bell
21W–28L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.