Teams

PCRK BLUE

2024 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - TRIO

7 players · average NTRP 3.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-04-27vs HRCA-N GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesJane Hetherington / Janelle Williams vs Laurni Blanchard / Kelli Murphy6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2024-04-20vs LTFC BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesJane Hetherington / Annie Ross vs Stacy Ford / Jodi Little5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBarbara Gentry / Anne Mills vs Sandy Biley / Beth Zubowicz6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2024-04-13vs HRCA-N REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesChristine Aberle / Julie Whipple vs Rebecca Duque / Courtney Carignan5-7, 2-6
2024-04-06vs SS-H GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristine Aberle / Mary Ingolia vs Karol Stevens / Kristen Adams4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJane Hetherington vs Courtney Ring3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAnne Mills / Barbara Gentry vs Holly Strandes / Melodie Harris3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-03-30vs WC BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristine Aberle / Mary Ingolia vs Stacy Burd / Jamelle Leyden1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBarbara Gentry / Jane Hetherington vs Andrea Milanovich / Kate Mayoss6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Anne Mills
published 4
Annie Ross
published 4
3.73
Christine Aberle
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Janelle Williams
published
3.63
Jane Hetherington
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.53
Barbara Gentry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Julie Whipple
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Whipple + Anne Mills3543% games−0.9% vs expected
Barbara Gentry + Christine Aberle3545% games−1.3% vs expected
Barbara Gentry + Anne Mills123 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Gentry + Jane Hetherington123 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Gentry + Janelle Williams123 matchesnot enough data
Julie Whipple + Christine Aberle033 matchesnot enough data
Anne Mills + Jane Hetherington213 matchesnot enough data
Janelle Williams + Christine Aberle213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anne Mills
19W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Annie Ross
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Christine Aberle
62W–90L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Janelle Williams
26W–23L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.68
4
Jane Hetherington
16W–40L career · 4 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Barbara Gentry
35W–63L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Julie Whipple
67W–64L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.