Teams

MOUNTAIN VIEW TC/RENGSTORFF PK 18AW3.5A

2023 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.5

20 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
3.42
Lili Occena
published
3.33
Christine Fronczak
published 3.5
3.29
Marla Lindsay
published
3.26
Christine Comanor
published 3.5
3.26
Veronica Sanchez
published
3.24
Chie Imperato
published 3.5
3.19
Volga B Calvello
published
3.16
Alice Isaacson
published 3.5
3.15
Terry Huang
published
3.09
Sayoko Gibbs
published
3.06
Izumi Yaskawa
published
2.98
Jill Nagahara-Evans
published
2.92
Mary Beth Huey
published
2.67
Marie Wong
published
2.62
Joyce Madeira
published
Lindy Brauner
published
Maroussia Brys
published
Reiko Nashimoto
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marla Lindsay + Alice Isaacson303 matchesnot enough data
Veronica Sanchez + Jill Nagahara-Evans033 matchesnot enough data
Veronica Sanchez + Volga B Calvello303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Deepthi Vishwanath
11W–10L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.61
Lili Occena
12W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Christine Fronczak
50W–39L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Marla Lindsay
15W–13L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Christine Comanor
8W–16L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.26
Veronica Sanchez
11W–20L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Chie Imperato
3W–33L career · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
3.24
Volga B Calvello
15W–29L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Alice Isaacson
16W–29L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
Terry Huang
23W–25L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.15
Sayoko Gibbs
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%26%74%
3.09
Izumi Yaskawa
2W–11L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
Jill Nagahara-Evans
14W–17L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
2.98
Mary Beth Huey
16W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
2.92
Marie Wong
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Colleen McCullough
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
2.62
Joyce Madeira
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lindy Brauner
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Maroussia Brys
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Reiko Nashimoto
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.