Teams

BC-AltaVista/TonyChuan

2021 SCTA DOUBLES - Beach Cities · BC Men - 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.17 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-12-04vs BC-LLW-BillieJeanKingTC/KazKataokaLost 01
L#1 DoublesDarren Earl / Martin Chi vs Kanata Yamayoshi / Junichi Yamayoshi6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2021-11-20vs BC-Peninsula/JesseWuWon 10
W#1 DoublesMartin Chi / Darren Earl vs Eugene Zhou / Kevin Tan7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2021-10-30Won 10
W#1 DoublesDarren Earl / Christopher Reed vs Hisayoshi Watanabe / Tito Natividad6-2, 6-3
2021-10-16vs BC-SealBeach/MarkMihalcoWon 20
W#1 DoublesDarren Earl / Martin Chi vs Jeff Samoff / David Delgado7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLin Tang / Nicholas Ambrosio vs Kris Vogt / Jason Tropp7-6, 6-4
2021-10-02vs BC-RedondoUnion/AsamSheikhWon 10
W#2 DoublesNicholas Ambrosio / Sam Yang vs Gene Kim / Kosuke Imazeki7-6, 7-6
2021-09-25vs BC-Kramer/BrianKebschullLost 01
L#1 DoublesDarren Earl / Lin Tang vs Nicholas Starinieri / Eric VanderPloeg1-6, 2-6
2021-09-18vs BC-WestEnd/ArtWongLost 01
L#2 DoublesNicholas Ambrosio / Rand Lee vs Carlos Souza / Wil Chao0-6, 5-7
2021-09-11vs BC-MCC/TonyRojkoLost 01
L#1 DoublesMartin Chi / Darren Earl vs Robert Conte / Keith Simpson6-3, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Men - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Martin Chi
published
4.03
Sam Yang
published
3.99
Nicholas Ambrosio
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.89
Christopher Reed
published 4
3.60
Rand Lee
published
3.60
Darren Earl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Jong Lee
published
3.32
Steve Hirano
published
Lin Tang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicholas Ambrosio + Darren Earl314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Martin Chi
19W–14L career · no lines in 2021
<1%41%59%
4.03
Sam Yang
4W–10L career · no lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
4.03
4.5
Nicholas Ambrosio
90W–53L career · 3 lines in 2021
52%48%<1%
3.99
4
Christopher Reed
5W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
3.89
Rand Lee
2W–20L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
Darren Earl
108W–148L career · 6 lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.60
Jong Lee
6W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%66%34%
3.45
Steve Hirano
8W–4L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32
Lin Tang
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.