Teams

Valencia Bonita - Gredinger

2024 Collier Combo 50 & Over Spring · 6.5 Combo 50 & Over Women Spring

10 players · average NTRP 3.30 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-14vs Hammock Bay - CraneWon 10
W#3 DoublesRita Leone / Shirley Yagoda vs Patti Ramer / Susan Gruber6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2024-05-07vs Fiddlers Creek - FioreWon 10
W#3 DoublesRita Leone / Shirley Yagoda vs Marianne Gaffney / Leslie Sheldon6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2024-04-30vs Village Walk Bonita - LaggisWon 10
W#3 DoublesRita Leone / Shirley Yagoda vs Marilyn Neis / Diane Cosner6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGlenda Stein / Shirley Yagoda vs Laura Cirillo / Joanne Fasy4-6, 2-6
2024-04-16vs Marco YMCA - SchaufusLost 01
L#3 DoublesKate Gredinger / Shirley Yagoda vs Sarah Griffin / Megan Zimmerman6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2024-04-02vs Marco Ymca - ConteLost 01
L#2 DoublesGlenda Stein / Shirley Yagoda vs Marla Hoffman / Michele Pallone5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2024-03-26vs Isles Of Collier - M. YoungLost 01
L#2 DoublesBarbara Laustsen / Shirley Yagoda vs Marlea Bowser / Pamela Ginzburg3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Combo 50 & Over Women Spring have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Glenda Stein
published 3.5
3.25
Bobbi Burnett
published 3.5
3.18
Barbara Laustsen
published 3.5
2.90
Shirley Yagoda
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.88
Eva Migacz
published 3
Kate Gredinger
published
Keryl Ball
published
Lorraine Steuerer
published
Rita Leone
published
Sue Capps
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kate Gredinger + Lorraine Steuerer14660% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Laustsen + Sue Capps4256% gamesnot enough data
Glenda Stein + Lorraine Steuerer6061% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Laustsen + Shirley Yagoda1444% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Laustsen + Bobbi Burnett3249% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Glenda Stein
10W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Bobbi Burnett
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Barbara Laustsen
54W–38L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
3
Shirley Yagoda
155W–105L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%78%21%
2.90
3
Eva Migacz
2W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.88
Kate Gredinger
32W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Keryl Ball
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lorraine Steuerer
21W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rita Leone
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sue Capps
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.