Teams

SPTC Jacome

2024 Pinellas NA Mixed 18 & Over Fall · 7.0 X

11 players · average NTRP 3.42 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-08vs RCSP Fantauzzo MXDLost 02
L#1 DoublesChris Maddaloni / Tisha Maddaloni vs Shelly Watkins / Thomas Gross6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRima Terradista / Jonathan Thompson vs Alan Chin / Cathrine Chin3-6, 3-6
2024-11-17vs McMullen HalmLost 02
L#1 DoublesChris Maddaloni / Tisha Maddaloni vs Johnny Fung / Kim Williams5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJonathan Thompson / Rima Terradista vs Edwin Alejandro-Vega / Natalie Hensgen1-6, 2-6
2024-11-10vs RCSP Fantauzzo MXDWon 10
W#1 DoublesChris Maddaloni / Tisha Maddaloni vs Thomas Gross / Shelly Watkins6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-11-03vs Tarpon Mixed ClaymatesWon 10
W#2 DoublesChris Maddaloni / Tisha Maddaloni vs SANDRA CARTER / Robert Kivlen6-2, 7-5
2024-10-29vs McMullen HalmSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRima Terradista / Jonathan Thompson vs Lita Hollister / Kenneth Lucas2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesTisha Maddaloni / Chris Maddaloni vs Natalie Hensgen / Anthony Perez6-1, 6-0
2024-09-15vs Tarpon Mixed ClaymatesWon 10
W#1 DoublesRima Terradista / Peter Holtmann vs SANDRA CARTER / Robert B Buckner6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 X have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
George Jacome
published 4
3.61
Tisha Maddaloni
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.50
Chris Maddaloni
published 3.5
3.31
Michael Maas
published
3.29
Jonathan Thompson
published
3.22
Diane Haymes
published 3.5
2.91
Rima Terradista
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.81
Lisa Jacome
published
2.79
Abby Sterensis
published 3
Peter Holtmann
published
WAYNE SMITH
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tisha Maddaloni + Chris Maddaloni4255% games−8.8% vs expected
Lisa Jacome + George Jacome2348% gamesnot enough data
Michael Maas + Diane Haymes213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
George Jacome
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
3.5
Tisha Maddaloni
68W–28L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%19%81%
3.61
3.5
Chris Maddaloni
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.50
Michael Maas
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
Jonathan Thompson
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Diane Haymes
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.22
3
Rima Terradista
65W–66L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%75%24%
2.91
Lisa Jacome
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Abby Sterensis
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.79
Peter Holtmann
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
WAYNE SMITH
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.