Teams

Walsh

2025 Anne Arundel Adult 65 & Over · Anne Arundel Adult 65 & Over 6.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 2.88 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#2 DoublesRichard Abels / Richard Howard vs Melvin Williams / Hal Bloom2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Abels / Russell Maxwell vs Cary Sanders / Melvin Williams4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDouglass Lamartin / Timothy Norris vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesDouglass Lamartin / George Briscoe vs Bryant Centofanti / Melvin Williams6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRichard Abels / Mike Spivey vs Chris Cruzcosa / Chris Hofer2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAnthony Perotti / Timothy Norris vs Jonathan Gladstone / Bryant Centofanti2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRichard Abels / George Briscoe vs Chris Cruzcosa / Chris Hofer2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAnthony Perotti / Timothy Norris vs Melvin Williams / Jonathan Gladstone2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesTom Walsh / Anthony Perotti vs Hal Bloom / Xavier Estrada2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDouglass Lamartin / Tom Walsh vs Chris Cruzcosa / Chris Hofer1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTom Walsh / Anthony Perotti vs Hal Bloom / Cary Sanders2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSteven Edwards / Douglass Lamartin vs Chris Hofer / Chris Cruzcosa3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Adult 65 & Over 6.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
George Briscoe
published
2.93
David Connell
published 2.5
2.87
Richard Abels
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.76
Mark Rossi
published
2.75
Tom Walsh
published
2.68
Douglass Lamartin
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.67
Russell Maxwell
published
2.65
Anthony Perotti
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Mike Spivey
published
Richard Howard
published
Stan Williams
published
Steven Edwards
published
Timothy Norris
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anthony Perotti + Richard Abels3545% gamesnot enough data
Richard Abels + Douglass Lamartin1533% gamesnot enough data
Steven Edwards + Richard Howard314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

George Briscoe
13W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
2.5
David Connell
2W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.93
3
Richard Abels
105W–95L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
2.87
Mark Rossi
13W–33L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
Tom Walsh
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Douglass Lamartin
38W–56L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Russell Maxwell
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Anthony Perotti
27W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
2.65
Mike Spivey
10W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Howard
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stan Williams
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Steven Edwards
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Timothy Norris
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.