Teams

CRRC Racqueteers

2026 18&Over Women Day Fall · 2.5 Day

14 players · average NTRP 2.80 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-12-04vs Greenwich Racquet ClubWon 10
W#2 DoublesMaria Badey / Vanessa Ceradini vs Abby Finkel / Kerry Cox6-4, 6-2
2025-11-17vs OGTA Overserved - NYWon 21
L#1 DoublesAmie Greenberg / Karen Schneider vs Alexandra Bueso Vargas / Lindsay Tulchin3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Breakstone / Allison Steinbauer vs Lauren Longest / Anastasia Fetisov7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMadlyn Wagner / Cori Landry vs Amanda Stern / Cindy Palmer6-3, 6-3
2025-11-10vs TIA - 2.5Lost 12
W#1 DoublesKaren Schneider / Amie Greenberg vs Casey Hogan / Jennifer Macfarlane6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesCori Landry / Madlyn Wagner vs Komal Jhaveri / Jenny Wismer5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesRebecca Fisher / Maria Badey vs Jocelyn Zoland / Chamisa Wilkinson4-6, 3-6
2025-10-27vs Armonk Tennis 2.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesKaren Schneider / Amie Greenberg vs Tomoko Smith / Beth Prabhu6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesVanessa Ceradini / Cori Landry vs Christina Hayes / Sloane Dunn2-6, 1-6
2025-09-30vs Armonk Tennis: Sugar and SliceLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmie Greenberg / Meghan Jin vs Cate Bauer / Fiona Mickelson6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Breakstone / Maria Badey vs Meredith Weiss / Melanie Dritz6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristine Corr / Lise Mulderig vs Dana Hyman / Chari Hirshson3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.32 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Allison Steinbauer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Amie Greenberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.40
Meghan Jin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.38
Vanessa Ceradini
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.37
Cori Landry
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.36
Madlyn Wagner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.34
Elizabeth Breakstone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.33
Maria Badey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.27
Rebecca Fisher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.19
Christine Corr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.14
Lise Mulderig
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.11
Debbie Avidane
published 2.5
Karen Schneider
published
Yvonne Herrera
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Breakstone + Maria Badey4450% games−2.7% vs expected
Debbie Avidane + Christine Corr2733% games−2.9% vs expected
Christine Corr + Rebecca Fisher1433% games−18.6% vs expected
Elizabeth Breakstone + Meghan Jin6260% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Breakstone + Madlyn Wagner134 matchesnot enough data
Christine Corr + Madlyn Wagner404 matchesnot enough data
Vanessa Ceradini + Meghan Jin303 matchesnot enough data
Cori Landry + Madlyn Wagner123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Allison Steinbauer
10W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Amie Greenberg
11W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
Meghan Jin
18W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
0%77%23%
2.40
Vanessa Ceradini
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%81%19%
2.38
3
Cori Landry
10W–30L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
2.37
Madlyn Wagner
10W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.36
Elizabeth Breakstone
20W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.34
Maria Badey
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.33
Rebecca Fisher
6W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Christine Corr
26W–44L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Lise Mulderig
6W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.14
2.5
Debbie Avidane
14W–33L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Karen Schneider
2W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Yvonne Herrera
8W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.