Teams

Sweet Shots

Adult 65 & Over Early Start · 7.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SOUTHERN ARIZONA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-12-19vs Desert GemsLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarol Gibson / Nancy Millman vs JoAnn Bosworth / Denise Phillips0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDawn Greene / Stephanie Hoefle vs Gail Campbell / Caryl Wallin4-6, 5-7
2022-12-06vs SAZ 65+ 7.0 Ladies- GephartLost 02
L#1 DoublesSally Mathis / Merrillee Whren vs Peggy Ingraham / Anna Spitz6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRobin Dobrzenski / Barbara Beghin vs Margo Sackheim / Barbara Gephart3-6, 2-6
2022-11-28vs Go-GettersLost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Millman / Carol Gibson vs Jacque Goodrich / Rebecca Barrow3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesYanny Mahoney / Marilyn Semones vs Pamela Holzwarth / Jeani Voss4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDawn Greene / Stephanie Hoefle vs Karen Philpott / Sandra Conard6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2022-11-21vs Saddlebrooke Sure ShotsWon 21
W#1 DoublesSally Mathis / Merrillee Whren vs Mary Zimmerman / Linda Foy4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBarbara Beghin / Robin Dobrzenski vs Mandy Leith / Benith MacPherson4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCarol Bietsch / Marilyn Semones vs Anne Williams / Deanna McCann6-3, 6-2
2022-11-14vs Reffkin Senior- RitasWon 30
W#1 DoublesNancy Millman / Carol Gibson vs Marie-France Isabelle / Kris McDougal6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBarbara Beghin / Robin Dobrzenski vs Janice Igarashi / Constance Carter6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDawn Greene / Stephanie Hoefle vs Irma Ficzeri / Kay England6-4, 6-2
2022-10-24vs El-Con AdvantageLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarol Gibson / Nancy Millman vs Karen Maspero / Lori Rogers1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSally Mathis / Merrillee Whren vs Joanie Rooker / Sue Danner4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesYanny Mahoney / Marilyn Semones vs Judy MacGregor / Denise A Cahalan2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-03-25vs El-Con AdvantageLost 12
W#1 DoublesMerrillee Whren / Sally Mathis vs Nancy Johnson / Karen Maspero6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesYanny Mahoney / Carolyn Martin vs Judy MacGregor / Lori Rogers2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Cahill / Dawn Greene vs Joanie Rooker / Toni Chardukian0-6, 1-6
2022-02-18vs El-Con AdvantageLost 03
L#1 DoublesMerrillee Whren / Sally Mathis vs Lesli Hanby / Nancy Paulson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesStephanie Hoefle / Joan Harting vs Janet Bitter / Lori Rogers2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Bietsch / Susan Cahill vs Karen Maspero / Denise A Cahalan3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Nancy Millman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Sally Mathis
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.12
Barbara Beghin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Merrillee Whren
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.05
Yanny Mahoney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Marilyn Semones
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Dawn Greene
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.78
Carol Gibson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Carol Bietsch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Robin Dobrzenski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Stephanie Hoefle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Merrillee Whren + Sally Mathis414451% games−0.7% vs expected
Barbara Beghin + Robin Dobrzenski131746% games−10.1% vs expected
Dawn Greene + Carol Gibson31240% games−11.0% vs expected
Carol Gibson + Sally Mathis1730% games−16.2% vs expected
Dawn Greene + Yanny Mahoney11036% gamesnot enough data
Dawn Greene + Stephanie Hoefle2348% gamesnot enough data
Merrillee Whren + Carol Gibson134 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Millman + Carol Gibson134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Millman
25W–57L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
Sally Mathis
52W–67L career · 5 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Barbara Beghin
15W–23L career · 3 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.12
Merrillee Whren
51W–55L career · 5 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.06
Yanny Mahoney
15W–31L career · 3 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.05
Marilyn Semones
13W–25L career · 3 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Dawn Greene
24W–53L career · 4 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Carol Gibson
42W–71L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.78
Carol Bietsch
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Robin Dobrzenski
20W–24L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Stephanie Hoefle
14W–22L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.