Teams

WIL:Lehner

2026 Cape Adult 70 & over · 7.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-05-08vs MCAC:EpsteinSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPeter Weinman / Henry Brehm vs John Gauthier / Lincoln Passmore6-4, 4-2
L#2 DoublesRobert Gordon / Richard Mullin vs David Bernstein / Chad Small1-6, 3-6
2026-05-01vs MCAC:EpsteinLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Landers / George Lehner vs John Gauthier / Chad Small6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesPeter Weinman / Henry Brehm vs David Bernstein / Gerald Haigh7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStan Bratskeir / Bruce Katcher vs Irving Epstein / Lincoln Passmore4-6, 0-6
2026-04-11vs MCAC:EpsteinLost 01
L#1 DoublesRichard Mullin / Henry Brehm vs Gerald Haigh / Chad Small1-6, 0-6
2026-04-03vs MCAC:EpsteinLost 01
L#1 DoublesHenry Brehm / Peter Weinman vs Gerald Haigh / Chad Small0-6, 3-6
2026-03-21vs MCAC:EpsteinLost 12
L#1 DoublesStan Bratskeir / John Landers vs Alec Chalmers / John Gauthier6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRichard Mullin / George Lehner vs Chad Small / Lincoln Passmore1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBruce Katcher / Robert Gordon vs Irving Epstein / Walter Panis3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MCAC:Epstein418714113
2WIL:Lehner1441123155

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Thomas Sbarra
published
George Lehner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Henry Brehm
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
John Landers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Peter Weinman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Richard Mullin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Robert Gordon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Stan Bratskeir
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

George Lehner + Peter Weinman7456% gamesnot enough data
Henry Brehm + Peter Weinman7355% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thomas Sbarra
0W–7L career · no lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.13
George Lehner
28W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Henry Brehm
45W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
John Landers
53W–48L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Peter Weinman
155W–79L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Richard Mullin
2W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Robert Gordon
11W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stan Bratskeir
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.