Teams

ELW Christison

2021 Pinellas Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 MXD Sunday

10 players · average NTRP 3.88 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-20vs Seminole Lake TimminsLost 01
L#2 DoublesDane Houston / Precious Cabiling vs Kevin Burnett / Gina Timmins6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2021-06-13vs Pinellas - Tarpon/KronkLost 01
L#2 DoublesDane Houston / Marcy Faircloth vs Peter Martino / Joanne O Ryan6-4, 1-2
2021-06-06vs YMCA PerryWon 10
W#1 DoublesDane Houston / Precious Cabiling vs Jeff Huser / Chieko Perry6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2021-05-23vs Safety Harbor HueholtWon 10
W#3 DoublesJillene Davis / Steve Unger vs Emiliya Cogdill / Mikael Derderian6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2021-05-16vs McMullen FramersWon 10
W#1 DoublesDane Houston / Joy DSa vs Brian Hodapp / Aubrey Posey6-2, 7-5
2021-04-25Won 20
W#1 DoublesKelly Hansen / Dane Houston vs Donna Tordi / David Tordi6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJillene Davis / Steve Unger vs Danielle Nickerson / Sridhar Sundaram7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 MXD Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.49
Clark MacCullough
published 4.5
4.13
Mike Moenter
published
3.90
Kirsten Willis
published
3.86
Josh Melton
published
3.61
Precious Cabiling
published
3.54
Dane Houston
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.47
James Bettencourt
published 3.5
3.14
Steve Unger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Jillene Davis
published
Wendy Unger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kirsten Willis + Dane Houston134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Clark MacCullough
8W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%54%46%
4.49
Mike Moenter
18W–9L career · no lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
4.13
Kirsten Willis
10W–16L career · no lines in 2021
<1%78%21%
3.90
Josh Melton
33W–11L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%14%
3.86
Precious Cabiling
9W–9L career · no lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Dane Houston
155W–187L career · 5 lines in 2021
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
James Bettencourt
15W–4L career · no lines in 2021
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Steve Unger
105W–85L career · 2 lines in 2021
14%85%<1%
3.14
Jillene Davis
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Wendy Unger
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.