Teams

McKeown/Nashville

2026 Adult 40 & Over - Nashville · 4.5 Men - Saturday Daytime

15 players · average NTRP 4.38 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-02vs Parrish/NashvilleLost 04
L#1 DoublesRandy Kerr / Brian Schaaf vs Craig Menzie / Charlie Sevier1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichael McKeown / Igor Shalkevich vs Gordon Williams / Edmund Sauer1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesArthur Garcia / Mark Sargent vs Mesa Carlson / David Carrillo0-6, 4-6
L#4 DoublesJeff Khan / Brandon Dixon vs J Christopher Atkinson / John Faldetta1-6, 4-6
2026-04-25vs Parrish/NashvilleLost 14
W#1 DoublesDavid Johnston / Robert Grimes vs David Carrillo / Edmund Sauer6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMark Sargent vs Jacob Parrish0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRandy Kerr / Sean Hughes vs Seth Benton / Mesa Carlson1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRay Blair / Ryan Reeve vs J Christopher Atkinson / Daniel Oxford3-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesRobert DeLucas / David Murrayd vs Brian Finkelmeyer / Craig Menzie3-6, 6-7
2026-04-18vs Parrish/NashvilleLost 04
L#1 DoublesRobert Grimes / Igor Shalkevich vs Seth Benton / Colten Jones1-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesMark Sargent vs Daniel Oxford4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesRay Blair / Arthur Garcia vs David Carrillo / Doug Story2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJeff Khan / Michael McKeown vs J Christopher Atkinson / Chris Mitchell3-6, 4-6
2026-04-11vs Parrish/NashvilleLost 05
L#1 DoublesRandy Kerr / Robert Grimes vs Seth Benton / Brian Finkelmeyer5-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesMichael McKeown vs Chris Mitchell2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Piovarcy / Brandon Dixon vs Jacob Parrish / Doug Story1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDavid Johnston / Arthur Garcia vs Ryan Hitt / Daniel Oxford2-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesJeff Khan / Ryan Reeve vs Edmund Sauer / David Carrillo4-6, 0-6
2026-04-04vs Parrish/NashvilleLost 05
L#1 DoublesRobert DeLucas / Igor Shalkevich vs Charlie Sevier / Doug Story1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMark Sargent vs Jacob Parrish0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRay Blair / Jeff Khan vs Brian Finkelmeyer / Craig Menzie2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBrandon Dixon / Michael McKeown vs Chris Mitchell / Alvaro Victoria2-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesDavid Murrayd / Arthur Garcia vs John Faldetta / Brannon Jones2-6, 6-7
2026-03-28vs Parrish/NashvilleLost 05
L#1 DoublesIgor Shalkevich / Robert Grimes vs Edmund Sauer / Daniel Oxford1-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesMichael McKeown vs Doug Story2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Johnston / David Murrayd vs Mesa Carlson / David Carrillo7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRobert Cain / Mark Sargent vs Brannon Jones / Colten Jones3-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesRyan Reeve / Ray Blair vs Ryan Hitt / John Faldetta1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men - Saturday Daytime have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brian Schaaf
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.13
David Murrayd
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.12
Michael McKeown
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
4.06
Randy Kerr
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.04
Igor Shalkevich
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
4.04
Robert Grimes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.01
Brandon Dixon
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.96
Ray Blair
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.96
Ryan Reeve
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.92
Sean Hughes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
Robert DeLucas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
3.84
David Johnston
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.84
Mark Sargent
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.73
Jeff Khan
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.63
John Piovarcy
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael McKeown + Mark Sargent2343% games+7.5% vs expected
Brandon Dixon + John Piovarcy134 matchesnot enough data
Michael McKeown + Igor Shalkevich224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brian Schaaf
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4.5
David Murrayd
0W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
4.13
Michael McKeown
15W–27L career · 5 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
4.12
Randy Kerr
1W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
4.06
Igor Shalkevich
27W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
4.04
Robert Grimes
2W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
4.04
4
Brandon Dixon
11W–11L career · type A · 7 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
4.01
Ray Blair
2W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
3.96
Ryan Reeve
3W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.96
Sean Hughes
0W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
72%28%<1%
3.92
Robert DeLucas
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%73%26%
3.91
4.5
David Johnston
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
88%12%<1%
3.84
Mark Sargent
7W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
88%12%<1%
3.84
Jeff Khan
15W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
John Piovarcy
13W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.