Teams

CM RED

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-07-10vs DTC SILVERSplit 11
L#1 SinglesPatrick Kehoe vs Todd Wiebe1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJoseph Mullen / Joe Covell vs Marcus McCarty / John Chadd6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2023-07-03vs SKY NAVYLost 01
L#3 DoublesPatrick Kehoe / Richard Smith vs Mark Sabatos / Andrew Loyola6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-06-26vs MC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Goetz / Joe Covell vs Stan Martin / Steve Connell6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRichard Smith / Patrick Kehoe vs John Hartney / David Atkinson0-6, 2-6
2023-06-19Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJoe Covell vs Ryan McLaughlin2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Patrick Kehoe
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.95
David Goetz
published 3
2.94
Paul Tighe
published 3
2.90
Gordon Smith
published 3
2.85
Dave Colodny
published 3
2.80
David Milliken
published 3
2.77
Joe Covell
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Chad Olson
published 3
2.73
Joseph Mullen
published
2.65
Dennis Miceli
published 3
2.63
Mark Fulford
published
John Dellasalle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joseph Mullen + Dave Colodny4452% games+8.0% vs expected
Patrick Kehoe + Gordon Smith8360% games+6.4% vs expected
David Goetz + Gordon Smith6355% games+3.4% vs expected
Paul Tighe + Joseph Mullen211553% games+3.3% vs expected
David Goetz + David Milliken4649% games+3.3% vs expected
David Goetz + Patrick Kehoe6355% games+2.7% vs expected
David Goetz + Chad Olson3354% games+0.9% vs expected
Chad Olson + David Milliken2741% games−3.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Patrick Kehoe
44W–33L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
David Goetz
83W–74L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Paul Tighe
61W–46L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Gordon Smith
58W–36L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%21%
2.90
3
Dave Colodny
39W–46L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
David Milliken
31W–52L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Joe Covell
41W–46L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Chad Olson
23W–33L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Joseph Mullen
61W–69L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Dennis Miceli
21W–30L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%<1%
2.65
Mark Fulford
24W–52L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
2.63
John Dellasalle
22W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.