Teams

LTFCS CARPENTER

2021 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - SOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - DAYTIME - SOCO

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-24vs MEMPK SHAINKLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Loh / Lisa Ostly vs Kim Young / Kele Hauke3-6, 2-6
2021-06-16Won 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Loh / Lisa Ostly vs Amy Hodges / Marian Nelson6-3, 6-2
2021-06-09vs CSRC COPEWon 10
W#2 DoublesSusan Skinner / Judi Ashmen vs Judi Cope / Diane Frankforter1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-06-02vs MEMPK SHAINKSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLisa Ostly / Gloria Carpenter vs Terry Beutelschies / Marion Nagle0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Loh / Judi Ashmen vs Ivy Liu / Kim Young7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2021-05-26Won 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Loh / Judi Ashmen vs Amy Hodges / Sherry Ingles6-3, 6-4
2021-05-19vs CSRC COPESplit 11
L#1 DoublesJennifer Loh / Lisa Ostly vs Carol Young / Judi Cope5-7, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJoan Skoog / Judi Ashmen vs Diane Frankforter / Carolyn Hofer6-2, 7-6
2021-05-12vs MEMPK SHAINKSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJennifer Loh / Lisa Ostly vs Terry Beutelschies / Susan Shaink6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Skinner / Judi Ashmen vs Teresa Vieira / Beatriz Arsuaga6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - DAYTIME - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Jennifer Loh
published
2.98
Judi Ashmen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.88
Lisa Ostly
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.76
Dana Kennedy
published 3
2.75
Amy CLARK
published 3
Gloria Carpenter
published 3
2.63
Deena Hiltbrand
published 3
Joan Skoog
published
Leonora Osborne
published
Susan Skinner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dana Kennedy + Judi Ashmen6160% games−3.6% vs expected
Leonora Osborne + Susan Skinner213 matchesnot enough data
Leonora Osborne + Joan Skoog123 matchesnot enough data
Judi Ashmen + Lisa Ostly213 matchesnot enough data
Judi Ashmen + Susan Skinner123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Loh
19W–11L career · no lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.11
3
Judi Ashmen
62W–33L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Lisa Ostly
123W–89L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Dana Kennedy
58W–21L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Amy CLARK
6W–7L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Gloria Carpenter
40W–29L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Deena Hiltbrand
36W–30L career · no lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
2.63
Joan Skoog
4W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Leonora Osborne
7W–17L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Skinner
22W–15L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.