← Teams

CAC-Ferek/Delplato

2025 Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.94 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Rudd McGarity
published 4.5
3.76
Liz DelPlato
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Scott Eliason
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.63
Katherine Kralj
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.53
Crystal Bryant
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.53
Robert Ferek
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.49
Tony Khamsouk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.36
Michele Snyder
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.17
Len Morales
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2025-05-23Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesCrystal Bryant / Tony Khamsouk vs Lisa Lyon / Chris Thoman6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRudd McGarity / Michele Snyder vs Christy Strange / Mark King6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesScott Eliason / Tami Oglesby vs Mary Klinger / Scott Powers6-1, 6-2
2025-05-18Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesCrystal Bryant / Scott Eliason vs Jonathan Quon / Marlene Enos2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichele Snyder / Rudd McGarity vs Craig Mills / Kris Kelly-Koster6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKatherine Kralj / Tony Khamsouk vs Christine Wall / Tom Lonergan6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2025-05-17Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesCrystal Bryant / Frank Olson vs Christine Wall / Tom Lonergan6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTami Oglesby / Len Morales vs Marlene Enos / Craig Mills6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRobert Ferek / Katherine Kralj vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-05-10Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesRobert Ferek / Liz DelPlato vs Brian Jones / Marie Picard5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTony Khamsouk / Tami Oglesby vs Mike McNairy / Karen McNairy6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesScott Eliason / Crystal Bryant vs Quanwang Wei / Carrie Fisher6-1, 6-0
2025-05-04Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesRobert Ferek / Michelle Jobe vs Angie Lee / Edmund Yuan6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLen Morales / Katherine Kralj vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-13Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesScott Eliason / Katherine Kralj vs Neil Soiffer / Angie Lee6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLiz DelPlato / Robert Ferek vs Edmund Yuan / Carla Wheeler6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCrystal Bryant / Frank Olson vs Danny Denning / Hong Jones7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2025-04-05Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesMichelle Jobe / Robert Ferek vs Marie Picard / Jack Schunk6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLiz DelPlato / Len Morales vs Kyoko Adcock / Steve Bolstad6-1, 7-6
2025-03-29Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesRobert Ferek / Tami Oglesby vs Stephen Crook / Minou Chau6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTony Khamsouk / Liz DelPlato vs William Haynes / Julie Carmena6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesRudd McGarity / Michele Snyder vs Daniel Lamey / Carol Chiu7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Rudd McGarity
33W–65L career
73%27%0%
3.79
4
Liz DelPlato
124W–99L career
1%99%0%
3.76
4
Scott Eliason
67W–73L career
6%94%0%
3.64
4
Katherine Kralj
142W–116L career
6%94%0%
3.63
4
Crystal Bryant
105W–117L career
24%76%0%
3.53
4
Robert Ferek
75W–92L career
27%73%0%
3.53
4
Tony Khamsouk
49W–115L career
37%63%0%
3.49
3.5
Michele Snyder
149W–123L career
0%97%2%
3.36
3.5
Len Morales
43W–69L career
8%92%0%
3.17

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.