Teams

Pinellas - Bardmoor/Pawlowski

2021 Pinellas Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 W Saturday

10 players · average NTRP 4.17 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-04-03vs Safety Harbor RomeroWon 10
W#2 DoublesKaren Abrams / Christina Dausch vs Allison Guerra / Diana Zarreke6-2, 6-3
2021-03-13vs Tarpon KronkWon 10
W#3 DoublesJennifer Drukteinis / Cheryl Pawlowski vs Deborah Golomb / Tori Disalvio6-1, 7-5
2021-03-09vs Tarpon KronkLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Drukteinis / Jennifer Garlick vs Abby Kronk / Marcy Faircloth2-6, 3-6
2021-02-20vs Safety Harbor RomeroWon 10
W#3 DoublesChristina Dausch / Monica Sanchez vs Allison Guerra / Cindy Swartz6-4, 6-4
2021-01-30vs Safety Harbor RomeroWon 20
W#2 DoublesJennifer Drukteinis / Cheryl Pawlowski vs Allison Guerra / Aubrey Posey6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesChristina Dausch / Monica Sanchez vs Amy Brooks / Natalia Illich6-2, 6-2
2021-01-23vs Tarpon KronkLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Garlick / Kelly Hansen vs Elizabeth Burdick / Jennifer Bell6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alice Hagan
published 4.5
Asbel Giang
published 4.5
4.16
Sonya Sherrell
published
4.05
Jennifer Drukteinis
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.83
Christina Dausch
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Jennifer Garlick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Monica Sanchez
published
3.71
Cheryl Pawlowski
published 4
3.69
Shannon Deck
published
3.61
Karen Abrams
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Garlick + Christina Dausch14166% games+9.1% vs expected
Jennifer Garlick + Jennifer Drukteinis6265% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alice Hagan
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Asbel Giang
7W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sonya Sherrell
3W–3L career · no lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
4.16
4
Jennifer Drukteinis
74W–25L career · type A · 3 lines in 2021
<1%34%66%
4.05
4
Christina Dausch
180W–109L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Jennifer Garlick
153W–95L career · 2 lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.78
Monica Sanchez
24W–24L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Cheryl Pawlowski
15W–15L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.71
Shannon Deck
9W–7L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
Karen Abrams
9W–12L career · no lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
3.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.