Teams

Post-Rust/McGill-DFC

2026 Eno River Singles 40 & Over · 40 & Over Singles 4.0 Women Evening

6 players · average NTRP 3.92 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-23vs EWyngaarden-HRLost 02
L#2 SinglesDayna Kelly vs Mary Feger1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 SinglesTerri Tarrant vs Carrie Couto4-6, 2-6
2026-06-16vs HWhite-UNCLost 02
L#1 SinglesChrista McGill vs Elizabeth Heetderks0-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesAmy Johnston vs Randy Smith4-6, 0-6
2026-06-09vs TWahlstrom-CHTCWon 21
W#1 SinglesAmanda Lacoff vs Olivia Lara6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesChrista McGill vs Jenny Perry7-5, 1-0
L#3 SinglesTerri Tarrant vs Sheridan Meltsner4-6, 4-6
2026-06-02vs HWhite-UNCSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAmanda Lacoff vs Randy Smith1-6, 5-7
W#3 SinglesAmy Johnston vs Hannah White3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-05-26vs EWyngaarden-HRWon 20
W#1 SinglesDayna Kelly vs Mary Feger7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesChrista McGill vs Julie Spearman6-3, 6-1
2026-05-19vs TWahlstrom-CHTCWon 21
L#1 SinglesAmanda Lacoff vs Jenny Perry5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesChrista McGill vs Sheridan Meltsner7-6, 6-2
W#3 SinglesDayna Kelly vs Andy Blackburn6-1, 6-4
2026-05-12vs HWhite-UNCLost 02
L#1 SinglesTerri Tarrant vs Cathy Joyce4-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesAmy Johnston vs Jenna Schreiber0-6, 1-6
2026-05-05vs EWyngaarden-HRLost 03
L#1 SinglesTerri Tarrant vs Elizabeth Wyngaarden6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAmanda Lacoff vs Julie Spearman3-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesSusie Post-Rust vs Jennifer Barrow5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 4.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Dayna Kelly
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.71
Amanda Lacoff
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.62
Christa McGill
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.61
Susie Post-Rust
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.55
Terri Tarrant
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4
3.31
Amy Johnston
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dayna Kelly + Christa McGill8358% games+3.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dayna Kelly
126W–99L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.94
4
Amanda Lacoff
191W–114L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Christa McGill
119W–124L career · 4 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Susie Post-Rust
81W–94L career · 1 line in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.61
4
Terri Tarrant
9W–36L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Amy Johnston
19W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.