Teams

LVTA NAVY

2023 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO

8 players · average NTRP 3.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-16vs FCCC GREENLost 01
L#2 DoublesNancy McIlvenna / Margaret Baxter vs Renee Gerrick / Brenda Iwamura2-6, 1-6
2023-06-09vs TAG BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmy Ritchie / Catherine Romero vs Mary Wilson / Helen Crews7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNancy McIlvenna / Elizabeth Galligan vs Vicki Davis / Sharon Sturges7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2023-06-03vs LAC WHITELost 02
L#2 DoublesMaureen Hartigan / Catherine Romero vs Tracy Nassar / Christina Cope6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNancy McIlvenna / Elizabeth Galligan vs Paulette Medley / Lori Segeth4-6, 1-6
2023-06-02vs LVTA REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesAmy Ritchie / Catherine Romero vs Bonita Hanner / Anita Helin3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMaureen Hartigan / Dawn Hagen vs Wendy Schaffer / Casey Ward3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-05-28vs FCCC GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesMaureen Hartigan / Catherine Romero vs Renee Gerrick / Brenda Iwamura4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMarcia Linley / Margaret Baxter vs Patti Helper / Carolyn Knape3-6, 0-6
2023-05-26vs LT ORANGEWon 20
W#2 DoublesMaureen Hartigan / Nancy McIlvenna vs Colleen Muhlbradt / Gail Draper3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Lumpkin / Catherine Romero vs De Ann George / Renee Adams6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2023-05-05vs TAG BLUELost 02
L#2 DoublesKaren Lumpkin / Catherine Romero vs Laurie Anderson / Denise Andrews1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMarcia Linley / Dawn Hagen vs Helen Dungan / Ann Smerud3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Wendy Thomas
published
3.84
Amy Ritchie
published 4
3.73
Nancy McIlvenna
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Maureen Hartigan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.61
Catherine Romero
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Dawn Hagen
published 3.5
3.14
Marcia Linley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Karen Lumpkin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Ritchie + Wendy Thomas6360% games+6.7% vs expected
Maureen Hartigan + Catherine Romero10652% games−5.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wendy Thomas
21W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Amy Ritchie
21W–19L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Nancy McIlvenna
17W–24L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Maureen Hartigan
65W–77L career · 4 lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.64
4
Catherine Romero
86W–80L career · 6 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.61
3.5
Dawn Hagen
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Marcia Linley
27W–68L career · 2 lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.14
Karen Lumpkin
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.