Teams

MEMPK FADILA

2025 CTA TWILIGHT - SOCO · MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO

10 players · average NTRP 2.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-09-03vs PBCP COPELANDLost 12
W#1 DoublesJohn Galloway / Scott Kruse vs Eric Copeland / Josh Chambers7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAntonio Henrique Batista De Moura vs Benjamin Morris3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKyle Mattingly / Mario Fadila vs Brian Justice / Jessie Garcia3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-08-01vs PBCP COPELANDLost 03
L#1 DoublesJesus Fermin / Cody Ahlgrimm vs Josh Chambers / Jacob Gonzalez3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAntonio Henrique Batista De Moura vs Benjamin Morris6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesThomas Hoover / Joseph Arnold vs Brian Justice / Eric Copeland4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Jesus Fermin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
John Galloway
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Scott Kruse
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Kyle Mattingly
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Antonio Henrique Batista De Moura
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Cody Ahlgrimm
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Mario Fadila
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.25
Curtis Lillybridge
published 2.5
Joseph Arnold
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Hoover
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Galloway + Scott Kruse213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jesus Fermin
19W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
John Galloway
9W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
Scott Kruse
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%94%5%
2.79
Kyle Mattingly
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Antonio Henrique Batista De Moura
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Cody Ahlgrimm
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mario Fadila
4W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
2.5
Curtis Lillybridge
7W–13L career · type S · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.25
Joseph Arnold
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Hoover
0W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.