Teams

Holly Jolly Volley Girls

Fire & Ice 2025 - NA · Fire & Ice 3.0 Division

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-12-07vs Slice, Slice, BabyLost 03
L#1 DoublesCamille Reyes / Carol Covert vs Kros Charles / Jasmin Escutia6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJudy Cooper / Nga Tran vs Leanna Saenz / Barbarra McMinn Gonzales3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEllen Hall / Michelle Loredo vs Aurora Robles / Molly Mcnamara1-6, 1-6
2025-12-06vs Santa’s ServersLost 12
L#1 DoublesNga Tran / Alison Dearden vs Nashelly Arnaud / Mariana Reynoso2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Moore / MINNA ROTHE vs Johanna Boone / Neriza Simor6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesEllen Hall / Michelle Loredo vs Maribel Cadena / Stephanie Dukatnik1-6, 1-6
2025-12-06vs Slice, Slice, BabyLost 12
L#1 DoublesMINNA ROTHE / Judy Cooper vs Assel Doyle / Kros Charles3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Covert / Ana Lucia Trevino vs Jasmin Escutia / Brenda Escutia Woods6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesSherri Stewart / Alison Dearden vs Rosita Saenz / Barbarra McMinn Gonzales6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2025-12-05vs Santa’s ServersSplit 11
W#2 DoublesLisa Moore / Carol Covert vs Kate Monroe / Janeth J Ayoub6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSherri Stewart / Michelle Loredo vs Neriza Simor / JENE MILLER3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fire & Ice 3.0 Division have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Ana Lucia Trevino
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.99
MINNA ROTHE
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Alison Dearden
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.83
Erika Ramsey
published 3
2.83
Nga Tran
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.63
Judy Cooper
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.60
Sherri Stewart
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Ellen Hall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.45
Carol Covert
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.30
Michelle Loredo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sherri Stewart + Judy Cooper3261% games+5.6% vs expected
Alison Dearden + Nga Tran1439% games−9.8% vs expected
Michelle Loredo + Ellen Hall033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ana Lucia Trevino
18W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.06
MINNA ROTHE
14W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Alison Dearden
28W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Erika Ramsey
21W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
Nga Tran
29W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
Judy Cooper
16W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
2.63
Sherri Stewart
11W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Ellen Hall
2W–15L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.47
3
Carol Covert
1W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.45
Michelle Loredo
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.