Teams

PY Sullivan WSL A18-3.5WW

2026 WMI WSL Adult 18&Over Weekend Leagues · WMI WSL A18&O 3.5 WW (8 player)

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-09vs PTC Portenga WSL A18-3.5WWLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaren Heuer / Donna Weber vs Alyssa Lantz-Trier / Angie Portenga2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Einspahr / Cathy Wisloski vs Riley Elders / Carrie Keil4-6, 4-6
2026-04-18vs MVS Gay WSL A18-3.5WWLost 14
L#1 DoublesGlorianna Fogarty / Cary Sullivan vs Kristen Schestag / Natsuko Tsutsumi Buckhold5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesEliska Schnabel vs Samantha Keith6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTatiana Holmgren / Karen Heuer vs Patricia Hunnewell / Barb Cribar7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesLynda Rhodes vs Shawnna Gunnink2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Gilmer / Cathy Wisloski vs Natalya Belaya / Margaret Greydanus6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-04-12vs WH BeVier WSL A18-3.5WWLost 13
L#1 DoublesCary Sullivan / Karen Heuer vs Laura BeVier / Eva Lieberman6-7, 4-5
L#2 DoublesTatiana Holmgren / Donna Weber vs Terri Beattie / Celestine Hasper1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesLynda Rhodes vs Sara Johnson0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Einspahr / Cathy Wisloski vs Renee LaCoss / Torrey Lapine6-2, 6-3
2026-04-04vs WH Schulman WSL A18-3.5WWWon 21
L#1 DoublesGlorianna Fogarty / Tatiana Holmgren vs Laura Britain / Lori Evans5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesEliska Schnabel / Karen Heuer vs Jessica Kelley / Jana Schulman7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDonna Weber / Susan Einspahr vs Martina Wisser / Lisa Ryan6-0, 6-1
2026-03-14vs MSU Vazou WSL A18-3.5WWSplit 22
L#1 DoublesCary Sullivan / Tatiana Holmgren vs Elyse Walter / Emalie Karp3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Heuer / Eliska Schnabel vs Lisa Pung / Sara Bet6-3, 7-6
L#2 SinglesLynda Rhodes vs Andrea Fraga1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCathy Wisloski / Susan Einspahr vs Lydia Rustmann / Stephanie Schmidt5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2026-03-07vs COE Witherill WSL A18-3.5WWWon 21
L#1 DoublesAmy Gilmer / Glorianna Fogarty vs Rachel Maas / Laura Rosekrans3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCathy Wisloski / Karen Heuer vs Chitra Gunaga / Rosemary Sheets6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSusan Einspahr / Tatiana Holmgren vs Anne Witherill / Darlene Johnson6-0, 6-1
2026-02-07vs MVC Orellana WSL A18-3.5WWLost 04
L#1 DoublesGlorianna Fogarty / Cary Sullivan vs Dawn Wolownik / Carri Wurm5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Heuer / Cathy Wisloski vs Kelly Kluting / Patty Reilly4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesEliska Schnabel vs Eileen Kishman2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Einspahr / Donna Weber vs Sarah Armbruster / Leanna Walker2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · WMI WSL A18&O 3.5 WW (8 player)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MVC Orellana WSL A18-3.5WW7027818226
2WH BeVier WSL A18-3.5WW6126921227
3MVS Gay WSL A18-3.5WW52201532283
4PTC Portenga WSL A18-3.5WW43221331262
5MSU Vazou WSL A18-3.5WW25152042327
6WH Schulman WSL A18-3.5WW25132245321
7PY Sullivan WSL A18-3.5WW25122349345
8COE Witherill WSL A18-3.5WW0753062405

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Amy Gilmer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Cary Sullivan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Karen Heuer
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.15
Glorianna Fogarty
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.13
Tatiana Holmgren
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.08
Susan Einspahr
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.02
Eliska Schnabel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.95
Cathy Wisloski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.93
Donna Weber
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.85
Lynda Rhodes
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tatiana Holmgren + Donna Weber3344% games+3.6% vs expected
Glorianna Fogarty + Cary Sullivan151850% games+2.1% vs expected
Glorianna Fogarty + Donna Weber21142% games−2.0% vs expected
Cary Sullivan + Karen Heuer3353% games−3.4% vs expected
Glorianna Fogarty + Karen Heuer2446% games−4.7% vs expected
Donna Weber + Susan Einspahr6948% games−5.1% vs expected
Donna Weber + Karen Heuer4350% games−5.8% vs expected
Cary Sullivan + Donna Weber2641% games−9.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Gilmer
40W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Cary Sullivan
94W–98L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
Karen Heuer
32W–66L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Glorianna Fogarty
113W–227L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
3.15
Tatiana Holmgren
46W–60L career · 5 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.13
Susan Einspahr
45W–47L career · 6 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Eliska Schnabel
19W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Cathy Wisloski
14W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Donna Weber
81W–160L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.93
Lynda Rhodes
45W–102L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.