Teams

Parker - Winter

2025 Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-10vs Gallagher - The DepthsLost 01
L#1 DoublesMatt Kline / Chris Parker vs Matt Gullickson / Erik Knutson4-6, 1-6
2025-02-17vs Thompson Mens 3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesChris Parker / Matt Kline vs Matthew Christensen / Nathan Dornquast6-1, 6-4
2025-02-10vs Jaspers: HIGHLY STRUNGWon 10
W#2 DoublesChris Parker / David Palombi vs Steve Jaspers / Scott Tretter7-5, 6-4
2025-02-03vs Gallagher - The DepthsLost 23
L#1 DoublesMatt Johnson / Parker Lahr vs Matt Gullickson / Erik Knutson7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJoshua Jebens vs Hunter Femrite4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMatt Kline / David Kang vs Kevin Duong / Alex Hilley6-3, 7-5
L#2 SinglesLaMont Robinson vs Brennan Witt1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKurtis Fechtmeyer / David Palombi vs Eagan Gallagher / Remy Williams6-0, 6-2
2025-01-27vs Sandozi - Minnesota SliceWon 10
W#2 DoublesChris Parker / Andrew Sayre vs Irfan Sandozi / Nam Ho7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-01-20vs Jossi TennisLost 01
L#3 DoublesChris Parker / Andrew Sayre vs Richard Rosenberg / Chuck Tatsuda5-7, 5-7
2025-01-13vs Craig - Net Hounds W25Lost 23
L#1 DoublesParker Lahr / Matt Johnson vs Richard Lassow / Robert MacHalek4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesMatt Kline vs Philip Green0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Kang / Kurtis Fechtmeyer vs Joshua Sillers / Mark Magelssen6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJoshua Jebens vs Jordi Martin Cossio6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRandal Rovinski / LaMont Robinson vs Arkady Shemyakin / Scott Simpson2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Parker Lahr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
David Palombi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Matt Kline
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Chris Parker
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.27
David Kang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Kurtis Fechtmeyer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Jim HASNIK
published
2.98
Jacson Miller
published
2.90
Randal Rovinski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
LaMont Robinson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Joshua Jebens
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Palombi + Kurtis Fechtmeyer213 matchesnot enough data
Kurtis Fechtmeyer + David Kang123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Parker Lahr
9W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
David Palombi
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Matt Kline
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Chris Parker
23W–29L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
David Kang
6W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Kurtis Fechtmeyer
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Jim HASNIK
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10
Jacson Miller
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.98
Randal Rovinski
0W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.90
LaMont Robinson
0W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
Joshua Jebens
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.