Teams

CMcKiernan/VShannon (Raintree)

2022 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-04-26Won 10
W#1 DoublesPeyton Foley / Vicky Shannon vs Janie Miller / Beth Godfrey6-3, 6-4
2022-04-19vs TAmos/AEagan (Weddington)Split 11
W#1 DoublesCiara McKiernan / Theresa Joiner vs Amanda Eagan / Olivia Day2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAngela Thomas / Vicky Shannon vs Tracy Amos / Karen Vaughan0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 DoublesVicky Shannon / Ciara McKiernan vs Angela MacMurphy / Mary Eshleman3-6, 3-6
2022-04-12vs RJampani (Blakeney)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesCiara McKiernan vs Shikha Agrawal4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-03-29vs MMcSherry (PCC)Won 10
W#1 SinglesVicky Shannon vs Cindy Stater6-0, 6-0
2022-03-22vs LMadonna (Weddington)Split 11
L#1 DoublesMary Anne Bullock / Ciara McKiernan vs Maryann Whalen / Sue Selleck6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesVicky Shannon vs Kimberly Snyder6-2, 6-2
2022-03-15Won 10
W#1 DoublesCiara McKiernan / Vicky Shannon vs Shannon Burke / Beth Smith6-1, 6-2
2022-03-01vs AEllis (Jeff Adams)Won 10
W#1 DoublesCiara McKiernan / Theresa Joiner vs Abbey Ellis / Stephanie Hrabovsky6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Ciara McKiernan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.77
Vicky Shannon
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.74
Sara Shelor
published
2.54
Theresa Joiner
published
2.50
Jenny Carlson
published
2.48
Mary Anne Bullock
published
2.40
Libby Noelke
published
2.35
Anje Seufert
published 2.5
2.22
Angela Thomas
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ciara McKiernan + Vicky Shannon314 matchesnot enough data
Vicky Shannon + Sara Shelor123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ciara McKiernan
59W–47L career · 10 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Vicky Shannon
87W–57L career · 10 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
Sara Shelor
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
Theresa Joiner
7W–14L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
2.54
Jenny Carlson
4W–18L career · no lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
2.50
Mary Anne Bullock
8W–8L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.48
Libby Noelke
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
0%78%22%
2.40
2.5
Anje Seufert
14W–28L career · no lines in 2022
0%88%12%
2.35
2.5
Angela Thomas
5W–16L career · no lines in 2022
0%98%2%
2.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.