Teams

UPTA40C/Young/GCC

2026 UPTA Combo 40 & Over - SC · 40+ Combo Women - 8.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.12 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-27vs UPTA40C/Kohl/RiversideLost 12
L#1 DoublesLiza Feniger / Liliana McGee vs Leslie Fite / Mary Walsh2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMartha McKissick / Katherine Hughes vs Janet Driscoll / Birgitte Ahrberg6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDeborah Roberts / Chelle Kelaher vs Cristina Koehler / Kim Brooks4-6, 0-6
2026-08-20vs UPTA40C/McGrath/GowerWon 21
L#1 DoublesDeborah Roberts / Veronica Young vs Michele Jain / Amy Caver2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMartha McKissick / Stacey Wheeler vs Grace Coleman / Christina Rogers6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary Elizabeth Allen / Callie Darragh vs Christi Brown / Keri McGrath6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40+ Combo Women - 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anne Carter MacNabb
published 4.5
3.87
Liza Feniger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Chelle Kelaher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Veronica Young
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Callie Darragh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Stacey Wheeler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Ashlyn Cousins
published 4
3.29
3.03
Liliana McGee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Martha McKissick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Elizabeth Allen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Veronica Young + Liliana McGee1644% games+9.3% vs expected
Veronica Young + Stacey Wheeler213 matchesnot enough data
Stacey Wheeler + Liliana McGee303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anne Carter MacNabb
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Liza Feniger
21W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.87
4
Chelle Kelaher
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Veronica Young
9W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Callie Darragh
26W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.63
Stacey Wheeler
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.54
4
Ashlyn Cousins
21W–19L career · no lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.50
Katherine Hinshelwood
3W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.29
Liliana McGee
15W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.03
Martha McKissick
9W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Elizabeth Allen
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.