Teams

YTC-Mach 3.0

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 MEN

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-02-22vs PC-All That RacquetWon 32
W#1 DoublesJoe Kim / Sean Michael vs Henry Han / John lastoskie6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesGabriel Michael vs Andrew Deskins4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJeff Ketcham / Kirk Ehlis vs Bildad Bildad / Daniel Pelkey4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMatthew Crow vs Kacee Giger6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDavid Richardson / Scott Jacky vs Jeffrey Powers / Daniel Cragin7-6, 6-3
2026-02-22vs CBRC-PakWon 41
W#1 DoublesScott Ladd / Matthew Crow vs Gughan Sathyaseelan / Nate Pak6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJoe Kim vs Jean-baptiste Aguilhon-levesque6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSean Michael / Kirk Ehlis vs Roc Hodges / Titus Woodson6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJeff Ketcham vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesFred Karau / Scott Jacky vs Aaron Cesar / Paul Monie6-4, 6-2
2026-02-21vs EW-PC-BjellaLost 14
L#1 DoublesMatthew Crow / Jeff Ketcham vs John Hilmes / Daryl Brown6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesGabriel Michael vs Grant Bruneel6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKirk Ehlis / Scott Jacky vs Aric Robertson / Brian Cunnington2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesSean Michael vs Keith Bjella3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesFred Karau / David Richardson vs Bryan Lee / Corey Chandler3-6, 2-6
2026-02-21vs PC-All That RacquetLost 23
W#1 DoublesGabriel Michael / William Levy vs Scott Adams / Henry Han6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMatthew Crow vs Andrew Deskins3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSean Michael / David Richardson vs Jeffrey Powers / Daniel Pelkey6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesJeff Ketcham vs Kacee Giger3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesScott Jacky / Kirk Ehlis vs John lastoskie / Daniel Cragin1-6, 2-6
2026-02-20vs CBRC-PakWon 41
W#1 DoublesWilliam Levy / Jeff Ketcham vs Roderick Busalpa / Eric Ferguson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSean Michael vs Nelson Lee6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKarl Lieberknecht / David Richardson vs Titus Woodson / Paul Monie6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesGabriel Michael vs Aaron Cesar6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesScott Jacky / Fred Karau vs Jean-baptiste Aguilhon-levesque / Roc Hodges6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-02-20vs EW-PC-BjellaLost 14
L#1 DoublesSean Michael / William Levy vs Aric Robertson / Grant Bruneel6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesGabriel Michael vs Keith Bjella1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJeff Ketcham / Karl Lieberknecht vs Lawrence Shepherd / Andrew McNabb7-6, 7-5
L#2 SinglesMatthew Crow vs Roman Andrew GAVINO0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesScott Ladd / Kirk Ehlis vs Daryl Brown / Jaehun Chun1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Karl Lieberknecht
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.96
Sean Michael
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.93
Gabriel Michael
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
2.85
David Richardson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.80
Jeff Ketcham
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.74
Matthew Crow
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.60
Kirk Ehlis
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.59
Fred Karau
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
William Levy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Scott Jacky
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Joe Kim
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Scott Ladd
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Jacky + Kirk Ehlis2544% games−7.3% vs expected
Scott Ladd + Kirk Ehlis134 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Crow + Jeff Ketcham134 matchesnot enough data
William Levy + Sean Michael123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Karl Lieberknecht
35W–50L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.19
3
Sean Michael
30W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.96
3
Gabriel Michael
10W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
David Richardson
5W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.85
3
Jeff Ketcham
18W–27L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Matthew Crow
11W–10L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
Kirk Ehlis
13W–34L career · 5 lines in 2026
23%76%<1%
2.60
Fred Karau
6W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.59
William Levy
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
2.58
Scott Jacky
12W–33L career · 5 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.57
Joe Kim
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Scott Ladd
10W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.