Teams

Pelican Bay North - J. Howard

2022 Collier Adult 40 & Over Winter · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over-Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-16vs COLLIER - Heritage Bay - BeaudetLost 01
L#3 DoublesToni Marie Silverman / Judi Howard vs Tina Jaquess / Victoria Pollock2-6, 1-6
2022-03-02vs Marco YMCA - WashakWon 10
W#2 DoublesDawn Cyr / Toni Marie Silverman vs Dawn Bertram-Stewart / Alicia Rosa6-2, 6-2
2022-02-23vs Winter Winners - Verona Walk - LeeSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLaura Buzzetta / Anastasia Brooks vs Susan Ackford / Patrice Clapacs6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesToni Marie Silverman / Michelle Bammel vs Mercy Abrams / Ellen Harvey6-4, 6-4
2022-02-02vs Marco YMCA - BurschLost 02
L#1 SinglesAnastasia Brooks vs Suzanne Messere3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesToni Marie Silverman / Christina Tabarrini vs Patti Ramer / Karen Correa4-6, 5-7
2022-01-19vs Quail Creek - J. BrownLost 01
L#3 DoublesToni Marie Silverman / Sandy Alevizos vs Marina Eschoyez-Quiroga / Aimee Hummel1-6, 3-6
2022-01-12vs Talis Park - Hurt-SimmonsLost 01
L#1 SinglesAnastasia Brooks vs Bethe Halpern1-6, 1-6
2022-01-05vs Quail West - PhelpsSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAnastasia Brooks vs Jane Mills4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTara Porte / Toni Marie Silverman vs Shirley Yagoda / Patricia Delaney6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over-Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Anastasia Brooks
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.47
Christina Tabarrini
published 3.5
3.40
Dawn Cyr
published 3.5
3.28
Judi Howard
published
3.24
Toni Marie Silverman
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.08
Deanne Brandstetter
published 3.5
Laura Buzzetta
published
Michelle Bammel
published
Tara Porte
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Toni Marie Silverman + Christina Tabarrini6262% games+2.3% vs expected
Toni Marie Silverman + Judi Howard134 matchesnot enough data
Toni Marie Silverman + Dawn Cyr303 matchesnot enough data
Judi Howard + Tara Porte303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anastasia Brooks
123W–72L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Christina Tabarrini
11W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Dawn Cyr
30W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
Judi Howard
78W–98L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
Toni Marie Silverman
60W–48L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Deanne Brandstetter
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
Laura Buzzetta
12W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Marie France McCloskey
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Bammel
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tara Porte
14W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.