Teams

TTA BLUE

2021 TRIO - DEN · MEN 3.5 - TRIO

6 players · average NTRP 3.67 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-04-17vs TTA REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesJuan Lucero / Mark Walter vs Keith Jones / John Daniel Singaram6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesToua Vang vs Kevin Kramer1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesEric Hargrave / David Mead vs DAN WISKE / Nile Knez3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-04-10vs SKY REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEric Hargrave / Toua Vang vs Thomas Abell / John Kippley0-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesDavid Mead / Christopher Prather vs Mike Bock / Robert Graham6-2, 6-4
2021-04-03vs CM NAVYSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJuan Lucero / Christopher Prather vs Tim Fitz / Craig Ricketts5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSteven Lee / David Mead vs Jim Roper / John Hutchison6-0, 6-4
2021-03-27vs CP REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesDavid Mead / Mark Walter vs Lou Gobis / Bryan McGee6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesEric Hargrave vs Brian Fitzgerrell4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesToua Vang / Steven Lee vs Dave Dombrowski / Christopher Ayala3-6, 4-6
2021-03-20vs STAP BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesSteven Lee / Toua Vang vs Seth Roland / Matthew Shafroth4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesChristopher Prather vs Andres Seijas6-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJuan Lucero / Mark Walter vs Jason Hladik / Viktor Bojilov6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Eric Hargrave
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.32
Christopher Prather
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Mark Walter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.16
Toua Vang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.16
David Mead
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.88
Juan Lucero
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Mead + Toua Vang10259% games+5.9% vs expected
Mark Walter + David Mead6551% games−5.6% vs expected
David Mead + Juan Lucero0539% games−8.1% vs expected
Mark Walter + Juan Lucero314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Eric Hargrave
15W–26L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Christopher Prather
57W–28L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32
Mark Walter
51W–36L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.22
Toua Vang
18W–19L career · 4 lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
David Mead
41W–36L career · 4 lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16
Juan Lucero
13W–31L career · 3 lines in 2021
82%18%<1%
2.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.