Teams

UPTA65M/Tindall/Riverside

2026 UPTA Mixed 65 & Over - USTA · 65+ Mixed - 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-06-27vs UPTA (A) 4.0M 65 & Over (Smith)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSteven Anderson / Birgitte Ahrberg vs Jerry Kortenber / Patti Kortenber4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAlison Frazier / Raymond Frazier vs Michelle Savercool / Rodger Coubrough7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCarol McCoy / John McCoy vs Larry Smith / Cindy Eleftheriou4-6, 0-6
2026-06-21vs UPTA (A) 4.0M 65 & Over (Smith)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBirgitte Ahrberg / Steven Frandsen vs Cindy Eleftheriou / Robert Jerdan2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAlison Frazier / Raymond Frazier vs Rodger Coubrough / Lisa Maly3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Tindall / Mary Mueller vs Larry Smith / Patti Kortenber2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-13vs UPTA (A) 4.0M 65 & Over (Smith)Split 11
L#2 DoublesSteven Frandsen / Mary Mueller vs Lisa Maly / Rodger Coubrough4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Tindall / Nancy Kohl vs Michelle Savercool / Robert Jerdan6-1, 6-1
2026-06-06vs UPTA (A) 4.0M 65 & Over (Smith)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMichael Tindall / Nancy Kohl vs Rodger Coubrough / Patti Kortenber4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 65+ Mixed - 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1UPTA (A) 4.0M 65 & Over (Smith)4093891
2UPTA65M/Tindall/Riverside043919125

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Steven Frandsen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.66
Raymond Frazier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Alison Frazier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Birgitte Ahrberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Michael Tindall
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Mary Mueller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.05
Carol McCoy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
John McCoy
published
Mark Craig
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Raymond Frazier + Alison Frazier3343% games−13.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Steven Frandsen
29W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Raymond Frazier
12W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.66
4
Alison Frazier
14W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Birgitte Ahrberg
25W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.62
Michael Tindall
17W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
Mary Mueller
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
91%9%<1%
3.31
3.5
Carol McCoy
9W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.05
John McCoy
14W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mark Craig
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.