Teams

Gesher/Camak

2022 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 7.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-14vs MGeorge 7.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesKathryn Gerber / Deanna Drescher vs Laura Davidson / Amanda Bauer6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBunny Ratledge / Jolyne Taylor vs Jamie Martin / Melissa George6-4, 6-1
2022-10-07vs CBASONWon 21
L#1 DoublesMary Cockrill / Jolyne Taylor vs KATRINA SIZEMORE / Kimberly Walker1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCarrie Vander Vennet / Betsy Wood-Ehrenberger vs Allison Graves / Shelia Knoll6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBunny Ratledge / Bethany Perkins vs Chris Bason / Julie Fleming7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2022-09-30vs Sheehan/KerrWon 20
W#2 DoublesCarrie Vander Vennet / Betsy Wood-Ehrenberger vs Mindy Edwards / Adrienne Brewer6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJolyne Taylor / Mary Penn Lunger vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-09-23vs IpleasantsWon 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Hensley / Bunny Ratledge vs Leslie O'Brien / Sarah Breazeale6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKathryn Gerber / Deanna Drescher vs Cindy McCullough / Susan Rose6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNina Moock / Jolyne Taylor vs India Pleasants / Malinda Schantz6-1, 6-2
2022-09-09vs MGeorge 7.5Lost 12
W#1 DoublesBetsy Wood-Ehrenberger / Carrie Vander Vennet vs Jamie Martin / Lisa ONeill6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesHolly Camak / Deanna Drescher vs Amanda Bauer / Susanne Knowles0-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJolyne Taylor / Bethany Perkins vs Laura Davidson / Joy Cooper1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-09-02vs CBASONSplit 11
W#2 DoublesIsabelle Homes Gesher / Bunny Ratledge vs Allison Graves / Sharon Agresta6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCarrie Vander Vennet / Holly Camak vs KATRINA SIZEMORE / Kimberly Walker6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-08-26vs Sheehan/KerrWon 10
W#2 DoublesBethany Perkins / Carrie Vander Vennet vs Julie Sandridge / Martha Sanders6-4, 6-4
2022-08-19vs IpleasantsWon 10
W#2 DoublesIsabelle Homes Gesher / Mary Cockrill vs India Pleasants / Lynda Blelloch6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
3.77
Carrie Vander Vennet
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.72
3.71
Kathryn Gerber
published
3.60
3.58
Mary Penn Lunger
published
3.51
Jolyne Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.32
Bunny Ratledge
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Deanna Drescher
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Holly Camak
published 3.5
3.18
Bethany Perkins
published 3.5
3.12
Mary Cockrill
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Holly Camak + Jolyne Taylor14459% games+2.2% vs expected
Betsy Wood-Ehrenberger + Carrie Vander Vennet3348% games−6.1% vs expected
Mary Cockrill + Jolyne Taylor6447% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Hensley
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Carrie Vander Vennet
186W–96L career · 8 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Betsy Wood-Ehrenberger
14W–12L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
Kathryn Gerber
7W–3L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Isabelle Homes Gesher
7W–11L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
Mary Penn Lunger
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
Jolyne Taylor
140W–112L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Bunny Ratledge
60W–49L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Deanna Drescher
112W–101L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Holly Camak
17W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Bethany Perkins
8W–17L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Mary Cockrill
61W–96L career · 2 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.