Teams

2-SHanda-CHTC

2022 Eno River Adult 55 & Over · 55 & Over Adult 4.0 Men Saturday

9 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-04-30vs 3-WLillard-HRLost 02
L#1 DoublesJames Orleans / Roberto Gomperts vs William Lillard / David Sloan6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTimothy Buckley / Kenneth Phares vs Mac McCorkle / Michael Shachtman6-7, 4-6
2022-04-23vs 1-ELindblom-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesRoberto Gomperts / BRYAN WRIGHT vs Phil Korest / Philip Sweigart5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2022-04-16vs 3-WLillard-HRWon 10
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Kopf / Roberto Gomperts vs Tom Irby / William Lillard2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-04-09Won 10
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Kopf / Roberto Gomperts vs Ronald McMillan / James Sills6-0, 6-0
2022-04-09Won 10
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Kopf / Kenneth Phares vs Kenneth Gibbs / Jakay Ervin6-2, 6-1
2022-04-02vs 4-DJordan-EnoLost 01
L#2 DoublesKenneth Phares / Tim Pastoor vs Destry Jordan / James Sills3-6, 4-6
2022-03-19vs 3-WLillard-HRWon 10
W#2 DoublesSudhanshu Handa / Kenneth Phares vs Michael Spears / Tom Irby4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-03-05vs 1-ELindblom-EnoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Kopf / Kenneth Phares vs Mark Stone / Scott Beddingfield5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRoberto Gomperts / Bob Stocking vs Eric Lindblom / Edward Turner1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 4.0 Men Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Sudhanshu Handa
published
3.83
Chris Combs
published 4
3.77
BRYAN WRIGHT
published 4
James Orleans
published 4
3.44
Kenneth Phares
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.39
Roberto Gomperts
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.28
Timothy Buckley
published
3.25
Bob Stocking
published 3.5
3.20
Jeffrey Kopf
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roberto Gomperts + Timothy Buckley224 matchesnot enough data
Roberto Gomperts + Bob Stocking303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sudhanshu Handa
34W–17L career · no lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
3.94
4
Chris Combs
46W–30L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
4
BRYAN WRIGHT
11W–12L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
James Orleans
3W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Kenneth Phares
23W–37L career · 5 lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
3.44
3.5
Roberto Gomperts
25W–42L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
Timothy Buckley
32W–19L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Bob Stocking
18W–19L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Jeffrey Kopf
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.