Teams

SFV Fireballs

SFV-Adult 18 & Over-WeekDay · SFV Women 3.5 Weekday

10 players · average NTRP 3.60 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-05-28vs SFV Love 2 AceWon 10
W#2 DoublesShelly Djergian / Beverly Wilkerson vs Jenny Killgore / Teresa Hatch6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-05-14vs SFV All About the AceLost 01
L#2 DoublesBeverly Wilkerson / Shannon Minor vs Kayla Smith / Cheryl Hughart4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-04-09vs SFV All About the AceWon 10
W#2 DoublesShelly Djergian / Beverly Wilkerson vs Julie Arshonsky / Manuela Marino7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV Women 3.5 Weekday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Dana Ravner
published 4
3.60
Shannon Minor
published
3.59
Lily Crummy
published 4
3.56
Michelle Wild
published
3.40
Nicole Martino
published
3.38
Heidi Wettenhall
published 3.5
3.06
Angela Martinez-Lee
published 3.5
3.05
Tracy Levine
published
3.01
Shelly Djergian
published
2.69
Beverly Wilkerson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lily Crummy + Shannon Minor224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dana Ravner
19W–4L career · no lines in 2021
15%84%<1%
3.63
Shannon Minor
3W–7L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
Lily Crummy
30W–49L career · no lines in 2021
24%75%<1%
3.59
Michelle Wild
10W–14L career · no lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.56
Nicole Martino
6W–10L career · no lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Heidi Wettenhall
3W–0L career · no lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Angela Martinez-Lee
5W–8L career · no lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.06
Tracy Levine
1W–5L career · no lines in 2021
35%65%<1%
3.05
Shelly Djergian
3W–7L career · no lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Beverly Wilkerson
71W–109L career · 3 lines in 2021
8%92%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.