Teams

Smart Aces-de Montbel

2024 Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over · Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-31vs BHSC-RyanSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAlex de Montbel / Dave Contini vs Randy Livermon / Nikos Nikolopoulos4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAngel Santiago Torres / Paul Schmidt vs Tom Martinsen / Daniel Wist6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2024-05-15vs Forest Lakes-JorgensenWon 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Harmon / Angel Santiago Torres vs David Bowerman / Tim Hay6-2, 6-0
2024-05-10vs ACAC-BarrWon 21
W#1 SinglesAlex de Montbel vs Zane Broden6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAngel Santiago Torres / Patrick Manalich vs Christopher Hays / Henry Hickman6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesIan Caskill vs Russell Ridings2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-04-30vs BHSC-RyanSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAngel Santiago Torres / Derek Frazier vs Henry Clifford III / Daniel Wist3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesAlex de Montbel vs Nikos Nikolopoulos6-4, 4-3
2024-04-23vs Forest Lakes-JorgensenWon 10
W#1 SinglesAlex de Montbel vs Ed Leary7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2024-04-20vs ACAC-BarrSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAlex de Montbel vs Zane Broden6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAngel Santiago Torres / Greg Benham vs William Manning / Russell Ridings5-7, 2-6
2024-04-13vs BHSC-RyanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlex de Montbel / Dave Contini vs Jimmy Lee / Daniel Wist3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDerek Frazier / Angel Santiago Torres vs Henry Clifford III / Tim Grossman6-3, 6-1
2024-03-26vs Forest Lakes-JorgensenSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAlex de Montbel vs John Oliver4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMarcello de Montbel / Angel Santiago Torres vs Ben Jorgensen / Edward Lis0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
David Harmon
published 4
3.75
Alex de Montbel
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.75
Derek Frazier
published 4
3.74
Ian Caskill
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.59
Greg Benham
published
3.35
Angel Santiago Torres
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.22
Dave Contini
published 3.5
Marcello de Montbel
published
Matthew MacFarland
published
Paul Lorenzo
published
Peter Welch
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Harmon
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%16%84%
4.14
4
Alex de Montbel
95W–42L career · 7 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Derek Frazier
13W–21L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Ian Caskill
71W–43L career · 1 line in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
Greg Benham
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.59
3.5
Angel Santiago Torres
53W–36L career · 11 lines in 2024
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Dave Contini
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Marcello de Montbel
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Matthew MacFarland
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Paul Lorenzo
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Peter Welch
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.