Teams

LA - You Got Served

2022 USTA MxD 18 & Over - LA · LA - 7.0 Mixed Doubles

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-20Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJose MacKinney / Emma Gardner vs Anand Shah / Shabana Shah2-6, 1-6
2022-03-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesJose MacKinney / Emma Gardner vs Michael Budge / Priscilla Aviles6-2, 6-1
2022-03-06vs LA - Kiss My AceWon 20
W#1 DoublesJose MacKinney / Emma Gardner vs Kevin Rodriguez / Virginia Takeuchi7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCharles DeWitt / India Mandelkern vs Hai Vu / Sylvia DSouza6-0, 6-4
2022-02-27vs LA - Downtown AcesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBurke Marksity / Kinsey Ball vs Matthew Boehm / Yoko Kanayama1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesChris Tennenbaum / India Mandelkern vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-02-19vs LA - Shadow's AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmma Gardner / Jose MacKinney vs Rachel Berk / Simon Lim6-2, 6-1
2022-02-12vs LA - LATCWon 10
W#3 DoublesJose MacKinney / India Mandelkern vs Mark Roybal / Nora Suk6-0, 6-3
2022-02-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCharles DeWitt / Emma Gardner vs Ryan Chan / Shelley Shi0-6, 3-6
2022-01-23vs LA - Kiss My AceWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmma Gardner / Jose MacKinney vs Lucien Lacasse / Becky Leibowitz6-1, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - 7.0 Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Emma Gardner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Milo Ferenczi
published
3.52
India Mandelkern
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
Jose MacKinney
published
3.41
Veronika Zherdeva
published
3.33
Charles DeWitt
published 3.5
3.27
Kinsey Ball
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Chris Tennenbaum
published 3.5
Daniel Hatkoff
published 3.5
2.94
Genevieve MacNamara
published 3.5
Sophia Mallaro
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emma Gardner + India Mandelkern033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emma Gardner
23W–26L career · 6 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.70
Milo Ferenczi
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
India Mandelkern
41W–40L career · 3 lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.52
Jose MacKinney
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%<1%>99%
3.42
Veronika Zherdeva
23W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Charles DeWitt
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
Kinsey Ball
23W–24L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Chris Tennenbaum
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Daniel Hatkoff
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Genevieve MacNamara
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
2.94
Sophia Mallaro
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.