Teams

Game, Set, Lunch - T. Ritter

2024 Polk Adult 40 & Over - Women · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-06-18vs Polk/Marcewicz/40&Over3.0WWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Hogg / Melissa Butler vs Allison Sorenson / Hayley Hurd2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-06-04vs Lakeland Country Club - S. NormanWon 10
W#2 DoublesKaren Hogg / Wendy Delgado vs Lamanda Petcoff / Carey Campbell6-2, 6-4
2024-05-28vs CC of WH - M. SavantWon 10
W#1 DoublesMelissa Butler / Karen Hogg vs Erica Gill / Dionne Kohl6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2024-05-21vs Beerman Matchmakers - R. EspitiaWon 10
W#1 SinglesKaren Hogg vs Svetlana Darrow4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-05-14vs WHC Raquettes - G. TardyWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Hogg / Melissa Butler vs Kim Schmucker / Laura Barben6-3, 7-5
2024-05-07vs Polk/Marcewicz/40&Over3.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesMelissa Butler / Karen Hogg vs Julie Hartline / Allison Sorenson5-7, 2-6
2024-04-30vs Lakeland Country Club - S. NormanLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Hogg / Melissa Butler vs Sheryl Norman / Shannon Miles7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2024-04-23vs CC of WH - M. SavantWon 10
W#1 SinglesKaren Hogg vs Dionne Kohl7-5, 6-4
2024-04-16vs WHC Raquettes - G. TardyLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Hogg / Melissa Butler vs Debra Edwards / Geraldine Tardy4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-04-09vs Beerman Matchmakers - R. EspitiaWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Hogg / Melissa Butler vs Jihyeon Choe / Dorene Dyer5-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Karen Hogg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published 3
2.85
Sandy Smyth
published
2.81
Courtney Wade
published 3
2.73
Leisa Jordan
published
2.71
Sabina Elmasri
published
2.64
Hetal Rajguru
published 3
2.59
Tracey Ritter
published
2.54
Clara Copley
published 3
Wendy Delgado
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hetal Rajguru + Clara Copley044 matchesnot enough data
Leisa Jordan + Karen Hogg213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Karen Hogg
84W–99L career · 18 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.92
Sandy Smyth
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Courtney Wade
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%8%
2.81
Leisa Jordan
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73
Sabina Elmasri
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Hetal Rajguru
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
2.64
Tracey Ritter
2W–14L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
2.59
3
Clara Copley
2W–15L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
2.54
Wendy Delgado
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.