Teams

Dominique/55's/3.0/COQ Day

2026 Man · Cov Adult 55 & Over - Women Day

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-02-10Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMary Glaviano / Terri Schexnaydre vs Cathy West / Debbie Morvant4-6, 3-6
2026-02-03Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMary Sciortino / Mary Glaviano vs Ann Marie Covington / Debbie Morvant1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Cov Adult 55 & Over - Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Diane Navoy
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Allison Harrison
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Fran Dominique
usually #3 Doubles 59%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published
Gail Miller
usually #3 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Kim Kocken
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published
Lauren Ortis
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mary Glaviano
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Sciortino
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Melanie Olinde
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 19% · published
Rita Rebouche
usually #1 Doubles 65%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
SHELLY GALLARDO
usually #2 Doubles 49%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published
Stacey Monaghan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Terri Schexnaydre
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

SHELLY GALLARDO + Rita Rebouche2539% gamesnot enough data
Gail Miller + Diane Navoy3353% gamesnot enough data
Kim Kocken + Lauren Ortis4156% gamesnot enough data
Terri Schexnaydre + Kim Kocken404 matchesnot enough data
Fran Dominique + Lauren Ortis314 matchesnot enough data
Gail Miller + Kim Kocken123 matchesnot enough data
Rita Rebouche + Diane Navoy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Diane Navoy
13W–18L career · 25 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Allison Harrison
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Fran Dominique
27W–26L career · 22 lines in 2026
not enough data
Gail Miller
24W–34L career · 22 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kim Kocken
37W–25L career · 25 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lauren Ortis
14W–12L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Glaviano
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Sciortino
2W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Melanie Olinde
8W–28L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rita Rebouche
12W–23L career · 23 lines in 2026
not enough data
SHELLY GALLARDO
12W–49L career · 41 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stacey Monaghan
10W–10L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Terri Schexnaydre
8W–5L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.