Teams

SB LLWx-Rally Girls

Adult 40 & Over - SB Winter · SB - Women - 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-05vs SBTC-Aperol AcesWon 21
L#1 DoublesJenny Killgore / Susan Bender vs Darcie Burk / Renee Houston6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDenise Sordyl / Julie Hirsch vs Jill Byron-Salzman / Erin Shaffer6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesUsha DeMatteo / Nicole de la Cruz vs Stephanie Do / Jessica Gibbs6-1, 6-1
2026-03-15vs La Cumbre-SpinnersWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulie Hirsch / Denise Sordyl vs Leslie Schneiderman / Elisabeth Zahm6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNicole de la Cruz / Susan Bender vs Christy Janka / Monica Kaderali6-2, 6-2
2026-02-22vs La Cumbre-SpinnersWon 20
W#1 DoublesJane Van Brussel / Usha DeMatteo vs Jennifer Kramer / Christy Janka6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Bender / Kim Kotnik vs Elisabeth Zahm / Eunju Yoo7-6, 6-0
2026-02-01vs SBTC-Aperol AcesWon 30
W#1 DoublesJane Van Brussel / Usha DeMatteo vs Susan Dunton / Erin Shaffer6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJulie Hirsch / Nancy Arkin vs Namita Patel / Lilia Hine6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNicole de la Cruz / Denise Sordyl vs Jill Byron-Salzman / Darcie Burk6-2, 6-3
2026-01-17vs SBTC-Aperol AcesWon 21
W#1 DoublesDenise Sordyl / Julie Hirsch vs Jill Byron-Salzman / Brenda Dentinger6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTara Fooks / Usha DeMatteo vs Stephanie Do / Kathryn Hinsch6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAliza Lederman / Jenny Killgore vs Darcie Burk / Elizabeth Heron3-6, 1-6
2026-01-14vs La Cumbre-SpinnersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJane Van Brussel / Denise Sordyl vs Leslie Schneiderman / Christy Janka6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Bender / Tara Fooks vs Jane Nicolais / Monica Kaderali2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · SB - Women - 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SB LLWx-Rally Girls601538103
2SBTC-Aperol Aces0531224155

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Denise Sordyl
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.99
Jane Van Brussel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Usha DeMatteo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.91
Julie Hirsch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.91
Nicole de la Cruz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.77
Tara Fooks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Kim Kotnik
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Aliza Lederman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Susan Bender
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.60
Jenny Killgore
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Nancy Arkin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denise Sordyl + Julie Hirsch5258% games+9.2% vs expected
Nicole de la Cruz + Usha DeMatteo404 matchesnot enough data
Susan Bender + Jenny Killgore134 matchesnot enough data
Usha DeMatteo + Tara Fooks314 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Arkin + Julie Hirsch213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Denise Sordyl
15W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.06
Jane Van Brussel
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
2.99
Usha DeMatteo
13W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Julie Hirsch
13W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.91
Nicole de la Cruz
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
2.91
Tara Fooks
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
Kim Kotnik
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Aliza Lederman
2W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Susan Bender
7W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
2.71
Jenny Killgore
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
2.60
Nancy Arkin
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.