Teams

He.Suke18S

2026 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-27vs Ca.Hurst18SLost 02
L#1 SinglesGeri Russell vs Stephanie Styers1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesHeidi Suke vs Callie Hurst5-7, 4-6
2026-07-13vs De.Farmer18S2.5Won 20
W#1 SinglesCasey Christos vs Karla Esparza6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesHeidi Suke vs Vy Bui6-2, 6-2
2026-07-07vs Ra.Van18SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMary Hannah Andrews vs Kendall King6-3, 6-1
L#3 SinglesDevany Ayers vs Natalie Mayur2-6, 1-6
2026-07-06vs Sh.Bulkowski18SLost 03
L#1 SinglesMary Hannah Andrews vs Ashlie Bucy4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesDevany Ayers vs Joli Rueter3-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesCasey Christos vs Shannon Bulkowski6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-06-22vs Ca.Hurst18SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesCasey Christos vs Callie Hurst3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesNada Milkovich vs Emily Boyer6-2, 6-1
2026-06-15vs Mo.Lewis18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesNada Milkovich vs Nicole Nemmers6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAna Marshall vs Jill Orr1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-06-10vs Su.Potter18SWon 21
L#1 SinglesAna Marshall vs Kelly Baltzer3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesGeri Russell vs Emily Palanzo6-2, 7-5
W#3 SinglesHeidi Suke vs Amanda Haymore6-0, 6-0
2026-05-18vs De.Farmer18S2.5Won 30
W#1 SinglesGeri Russell vs Jessica Leight6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesNada Milkovich vs Karla Esparza6-3, 7-6
W#3 SinglesMary Hannah Andrews vs Kristine Rosette6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ca.Hurst18S802314133
2Ma.Ross18S611749112
3Ma.Harber18S6116512135
4Sh.Bulkowski18S6217718174
5Je.Hastie18S5214717151
6He.Suke18S44121225192
7Ra.Van18S44101429223
8Kh.Lemon18S34111022177
9Je.Tyndall18S34101124187
10Br.Welborn18S2571428193
11De.Farmer18S2.52561530218
12Em.Butler18S2551634226
13Mo.Lewis18S2661836238
14Su.Potter18S1671429208
15Li.Singler18S1621939241

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.38 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.58
Geri Russell
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.58
Mary Hannah Andrews
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.47
Heidi Suke
usually #3 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.43
Nada Milkovich
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.35
Ana Marshall
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.22
Casey Christos
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.04
Devany Ayers
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Geri Russell
19W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%28%72%
2.58
Mary Hannah Andrews
7W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%28%72%
2.58
Heidi Suke
13W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%58%42%
2.47
Nada Milkovich
11W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%68%32%
2.43
2.5
Ana Marshall
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.35
2.5
Casey Christos
5W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
2.5
Devany Ayers
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.