Teams

LFTCS DESQUITADO

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · MEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

12 players · average NTRP 4.44 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-05-25vs PBTC ROMANWon 10
W#3 DoublesFrank Backes / Albert Wu vs Dakota Stupar / Randy Ruybal6-3, 6-2
2021-04-27vs CSRC MCPHERSONLost 01
L#3 DoublesDenton Desquitado / Albert Wu vs Brian Thirkell / Jacob Brazeau3-6, 3-6
2021-04-20vs PBTC ROMANWon 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Kirkland / Albert Wu vs Dakota Stupar / Bradley Gerler6-2, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.06 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.47
Jordan Hall
published
4.38
Denton Desquitado
published 4.5
Brian Keener
published 4.5
4.21
Pat Pottger
published 4.5
4.12
Frank Backes
published 4.5
3.79
David Kirkland
published 4
3.73
Jae Kim
published 4.5
3.72
Albert Wu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Eric Lewandowski
published
Jon New
published
Oscar Subirats
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jordan Hall + Oscar Subirats5156% games+1.1% vs expected
Pat Pottger + Frank Backes5550% games−7.2% vs expected
Jae Kim + Denton Desquitado5165% gamesnot enough data
Jon New + Brian Keener224 matchesnot enough data
Brian Keener + Pat Pottger224 matchesnot enough data
Jordan Hall + Pat Pottger123 matchesnot enough data
Jordan Hall + Denton Desquitado303 matchesnot enough data
Pat Pottger + Denton Desquitado213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jordan Hall
54W–16L career · no lines in 2021
<1%59%41%
4.47
4.5
Denton Desquitado
26W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%82%17%
4.38
4.5
Benjamin Fehrman-Lee
4W–10L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Brian Keener
9W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Pat Pottger
95W–80L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
4.21
4.5
Frank Backes
23W–37L career · no lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
4.12
4
David Kirkland
30W–37L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.79
4.5
Jae Kim
20W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2021
98%2%<1%
3.73
4.5
Albert Wu
15W–25L career · 3 lines in 2021
98%2%<1%
3.72
Eric Lewandowski
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jon New
44W–15L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Oscar Subirats
12W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.