Teams

B6 Burkwood Kovarcik

2023 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-04vs B3 Avalon LuchsingerLost 01
L#1 DoublesMike Davis / Joseph Golden vs Keyur Shah / Kristopher Johnson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-05-23vs B7 ACAC CarterWon 10
W#1 DoublesMike Davis / Samuel Poole vs Randolph Moore / Steven L'Heureux6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2023-05-21vs B1 CCV MurphyWon 10
W#2 DoublesMike Davis / Joseph Golden vs Peyton Cox / Taylor Brannan7-5, 7-5
2023-05-07vs B4 Salisbury BrownWon 10
W#1 DoublesMike Davis / Joseph Golden vs Todd McCormack / Ritsu Kuno6-0, 6-0
2023-04-23vs B8 Woodlake BrawleyWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoseph Golden / Mike Davis vs Ron Birnbaum / Wray Brawley6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Jonathan Kovarcik
published
3.36
David Voss
published 3.5
3.26
Mike Davis
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.19
Kevin Carter
published
3.13
David Ames
published 3.5
3.01
Travis Prowant
published
2.92
Charlie Chien Le
published 3.5
2.61
Wayne Clark
published
Joseph Golden
published
Richard Shute
published
Rodney Cole
published
Travis Preau
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joseph Golden + Richard Shute5165% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jonathan Kovarcik
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
David Voss
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Mike Davis
95W–71L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
Kevin Carter
11W–5L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
David Ames
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.13
Travis Prowant
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.01
3.5
Charlie Chien Le
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
73%27%<1%
2.92
Wayne Clark
6W–16L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
2.61
Joseph Golden
15W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Shute
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rodney Cole
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Travis Preau
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.