Teams

Brevard/Wolszczak/18&Over4.5W

2024 Brevard Adult 18 & Over Early Start · 4.5 Adult Early-Start 18 & Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.42 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-11-20vs Desoto - DelgadoWon 10
W#1 DoublesLarissa Kiyoku / Erika Nigh vs Donna Gross / Terry Taylor6-1, 6-2
2023-11-05vs Desoto - DelgadoWon 20
W#1 DoublesErika Nigh / Larissa Kiyoku vs Margaret Cornell / Gina Palombi6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesErica Cossairt / Julie Wolszczak vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-10-29vs Desoto - DelgadoWon 10
W#2 DoublesColleen McNatt / Erica Cossairt vs Margaret Cornell / Debbie Giorgio6-1, 6-0
2023-10-27vs Desoto - DelgadoWon 20
W#1 SinglesErika Nigh vs Paige Hill6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesColleen McNatt / Julie Wolszczak vs Debbie Giorgio / Margaret Cornell3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-10-15vs Desoto - DelgadoWon 20
W#2 DoublesColleen McNatt / Julie Wolszczak vs Paige Hill / Terry Taylor6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesErica Cossairt / Erika Nigh vs Donna Gross / Debbie Giorgio6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult Early-Start 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.18 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.49
Larissa Kiyoku
published
4.40
Erika Nigh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.32
Andreea Carpenter
published 4.5
4.27
Erica Cossairt
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.23
Colleen McNatt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.22
Kristin Harang
published
4.21
Cheryl Keller
published 4.5
3.85
Julie Wolszczak
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.69
Tracy Oates
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erica Cossairt + Colleen McNatt18562% games+15.2% vs expected
Kristin Harang + Andreea Carpenter15860% games+4.5% vs expected
Erika Nigh + Colleen McNatt3255% games−4.3% vs expected
Erica Cossairt + Erika Nigh4257% gamesnot enough data
Julie Wolszczak + Colleen McNatt6057% gamesnot enough data
Kristin Harang + Colleen McNatt314 matchesnot enough data
Kristin Harang + Erika Nigh213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Larissa Kiyoku
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
4.49
4.5
Erika Nigh
39W–39L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
4.40
4.5
Andreea Carpenter
55W–34L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Erica Cossairt
75W–29L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Colleen McNatt
103W–54L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
Kristin Harang
63W–30L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Cheryl Keller
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.21
4
Julie Wolszczak
64W–27L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.85
Tracy Oates
6W–14L career · no lines in 2024
99%1%<1%
3.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.