Teams

Bryan - Highland Country Club 65+

2025 Sandhills Adult 65 & over · 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-16vs Harris - Lawn and Tennis 65+Won 10
W#2 DoublesKim Hasty / Karen Rogers vs Cynthia Ballantyne / Donna Hicks6-0, 6-0
2025-04-09vs Harris - Lawn and Tennis 65+Won 10
W#1 DoublesKim Hasty / Deborah Milburn vs Victoria Adkins / Amie Irby6-4, 6-0
2025-03-26vs Harris - Lawn and Tennis 65+Won 10
W#1 DoublesKim Hasty / Lynn Floyd vs Victoria Adkins / Cassie Drexel6-4, 7-5
2025-03-19vs Harris - Lawn and Tennis 65+Won 10
W#1 DoublesKim Hasty / Mary Bonsall vs Victoria Adkins / Lisa Cook6-4, 6-3
2025-03-15Won 10
W#1 DoublesKim Hasty / Mary Bonsall vs Ellen Harris / Lisa Cook6-2, 6-4
2025-03-12vs Harris - Lawn and Tennis 65+Won 10
W#1 DoublesKim Hasty / Mary Bonsall vs Ellen Harris / Marcy Isenhart6-3, 6-4
2025-02-26vs Harris - Lawn and Tennis 65+Won 10
W#1 DoublesMarion Bryan / Kim Hasty vs Ellen Harris / Donna Hicks6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Mary Bonsall
published
3.40
Pia Thompson
published
3.37
Charlotte Gallagher
published 3.5
3.35
Kim Hasty
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.32
Harriett Shooter
published 3.5
Deborah Milburn
published 3.5
3.15
Susan Cheatwood
published
3.15
Marion Bryan
published
3.01
Lynn Floyd
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Hasty + Mary Bonsall6167% games+1.9% vs expected
Marion Bryan + Lynn Floyd224 matchesnot enough data
Susan Cheatwood + Marion Bryan303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Bonsall
14W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Pia Thompson
17W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Charlotte Gallagher
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Kim Hasty
148W–106L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Harriett Shooter
24W–20L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Deborah Milburn
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Cheatwood
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.15
Marion Bryan
18W–27L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15
Lynn Floyd
33W–45L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.