Teams

MORAGA CC 40AW3.5A-DT

2024 ADULT 40&Over - Daytime · Women's 3.5

22 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
3.67
Lauren Fritch
published
3.64
Connie Koplan
published 4
3.45
Cathy Harris
published 3.5
3.39
Lara Williamson
published
3.35
Denise Acker
published 3.5
3.33
Blaire Morse
published 3.5
3.27
Vy Spoto
published
3.26
Wendy Means
published
3.22
Kimberley Zembsch
published
3.22
Michelle Holcenberg
published
3.21
Vanessa Imberg
published
3.21
Jo Mckinlay
published
3.17
Cheryl Cushing
published 3.5
3.12
Jennifer Yolasan
published
3.10
Megan Buckley
published
3.05
Kimberly Hunter
published
3.04
Celeste Warner
published 3.5
2.81
Nonna Pastore
published
2.80
Gena Schwartz
published 3
2.52
Susan Levy
published
Lucy Sponsler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vanessa Imberg + Michelle Holcenberg213 matchesnot enough data
Cathy Harris + Lara Williamson213 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Holcenberg + Blaire Morse213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Molly Harcos Tamariki
20W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.78
Lauren Fritch
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Connie Koplan
5W–10L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Cathy Harris
9W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
3.45
Lara Williamson
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Denise Acker
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Blaire Morse
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.33
Vy Spoto
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
Wendy Means
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.26
Kimberley Zembsch
7W–20L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.22
Michelle Holcenberg
9W–20L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.22
Vanessa Imberg
4W–10L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.21
Jo Mckinlay
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Cheryl Cushing
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.17
Jennifer Yolasan
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.12
Megan Buckley
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.10
Kimberly Hunter
5W–18L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.05
3.5
Celeste Warner
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.04
Nonna Pastore
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Gena Schwartz
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.80
Susan Levy
2W–13L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
2.52
Lucy Sponsler
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.