Teams

Sweet Shots 3.0

2025 Adult 40 and Over League · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.10 / EAST HAWAII

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-23vs Party At The NextWon 31
L#1 DoublesValerie Galacgac / Lori Yamamoto vs Gwen Tanaka / Sarah de Silva2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMelinda Mizuno vs Darnella Villanueva6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNiko Gagne / Marleen Cabarloc vs Heather Lee / Misti Tyrin6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesIoana Agasa / Joy KAMANO vs Merceda Rivera / Irene Yamanaka7-6, 6-4
2025-03-16vs Party At The NextSplit 22
L#1 DoublesRebecca Marshall / Billie Vieira vs Heather Lee / Chrissy Capati5-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesNiko Gagne vs Sandra McAuliffe6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMarleen Cabarloc / Joy KAMANO vs Darnella Villanueva / Yuko Uehana2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesErica Clarkson / Larie Kent vs Misti Tyrin / Irene Yamanaka7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2025-02-23vs Party At The NextSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMarleen Cabarloc / Rebecca Marshall vs Chrissy Capati / Misti Tyrin1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJoy KAMANO vs Darnella Villanueva6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesErica Clarkson / Lori Yamamoto vs Sarah de Silva / Mari Burns5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesValerie Galacgac / Ioana Agasa vs Iris McGuire / Merceda Rivera7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2025-02-08vs Party At The NextWon 31
L#1 DoublesMelinda Mizuno / Lori Yamamoto vs Chrissy Capati / Gwen Tanaka1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJoy KAMANO vs Sandra McAuliffe6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSharon Chong / Billie Vieira vs Sarah de Silva / Irene Yamanaka6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesErica Clarkson / Larie Kent vs Heather Lee / Darnella Villanueva6-3, 6-4
2025-01-18vs Party At The NextLost 04
L#1 DoublesLarie Kent / Billie Vieira vs Yuko Uehana / Irene Yamanaka2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesNiko Gagne vs Sandra McAuliffe4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMarleen Cabarloc / Joy KAMANO vs Chrissy Capati / Gwen Tanaka1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesErica Clarkson / Valerie Galacgac vs Misti Tyrin / Heather Lee2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-01-12vs Party At The NextSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBillie Vieira / Marleen Cabarloc vs Chrissy Capati / Heather Lee3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMelinda Mizuno vs Sandra McAuliffe6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesValerie Galacgac / Rebecca Marshall vs Sarah de Silva / Mari Burns1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSharon Chong / Niko Gagne vs Iris McGuire / Yuko Uehana6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Melinda Mizuno
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
2.98
Niko Gagne
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.94
Joy KAMANO
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.86
Erica Clarkson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.85
Sharon Chong
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.77
Marleen Cabarloc
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
2.70
Billie Vieira
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.68
Stephanie Oshiro
published 3
2.66
Rebecca Marshall
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.63
Valerie Galacgac
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Ioana Agasa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Larie Kent
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Lori Yamamoto
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marleen Cabarloc + Valerie Galacgac5457% games+17.5% vs expected
Billie Vieira + Sharon Chong5354% games+12.5% vs expected
Marleen Cabarloc + Sharon Chong6457% games+10.4% vs expected
Melinda Mizuno + Joy KAMANO3443% games+6.5% vs expected
Larie Kent + Billie Vieira6359% games+2.2% vs expected
Marleen Cabarloc + Joy KAMANO5154% games−3.8% vs expected
Marleen Cabarloc + Billie Vieira4551% games−5.6% vs expected
Valerie Galacgac + Sharon Chong1534% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Melinda Mizuno
38W–75L career · 7 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Niko Gagne
55W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.98
3
Joy KAMANO
50W–48L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Erica Clarkson
6W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
Sharon Chong
46W–42L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
Marleen Cabarloc
79W–74L career · 8 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Billie Vieira
60W–49L career · 7 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Stephanie Oshiro
41W–37L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Rebecca Marshall
44W–60L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
3
Valerie Galacgac
101W–147L career · 5 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
Ioana Agasa
44W–45L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Larie Kent
42W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lori Yamamoto
22W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.