Teams

Rogers/Osman

2023 18&Over Women Spring · Summer

15 players · average NTRP 2.93 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-23vs She BangsSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAmy Pham / Lauren Guarcello vs Ann Gaus / Danielle Alpaugh5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMeeghan Rogers vs Shannon Novak6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAmy Dube / Anne Warde vs Megan Collard / Marie Fahs6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMelanie Radeschi / Dana Lugo vs Kathryn Hartigan / Maria Crowley2-6, 2-6
2023-06-16vs Bad AcesLost 12
W#1 DoublesAmy Pham / Lauren Guarcello vs Marisol Young / Margot Meahan6-7, 5-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAmy Dube vs Elizabeth Miller1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMelanie Radeschi / Erin Mattingly vs Joann Mangarelli / Gerilyn Mahlof0-6, 1-6
2023-06-09vs All About That BaselineLost 04
L#1 DoublesAmanda Loennecker / Amy Pham vs Catherine Eby / Laureena McCormack1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Featherston vs Margot Leo6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNicole Inkrote / Meeghan Rogers vs Keiko Gendi / Brenda Rollings7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesErin Mattingly / Gina Flanigan vs Michele Friedman / Kim Paris2-6, 4-6
2023-06-02vs She BangsSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLauren Guarcello / Anne Warde vs Clare Gray / Cindy Starke6-4, 2-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMel Jacobs vs Megan Collard6-3, 4-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichele Cruz / Nicole Inkrote vs Danielle Alpaugh / Tara Patlen4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesFran Allen / Erin Mattingly vs Marie Fahs / Maria Crowley1-6, 4-6
2023-05-26vs Bad AcesSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAnne Warde / Jennifer Featherston vs Marisol Young / Margot Meahan6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMel Jacobs vs Maureen Fichten1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmanda Loennecker / Melanie Radeschi vs Elizabeth Miller / Sue Fabisak0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMichele Cruz / Nicole Inkrote vs Robin Hirsch / Joann Mangarelli4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-05-19vs All About That BaselineSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLauren Guarcello / Amanda Loennecker vs Suzanne Greco / Charlotte Sclafani6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJennifer Featherston vs Bei Hu2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesFran Allen / Gina Flanigan vs Beth Fallon / Erica Kaplan1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMeeghan Rogers / Dana Lugo vs Michelle Cuneo / Patricia Martinelli6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Summer
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1All About That Baseline0616822192
2She Bangs06131128211
3Bad Aces0691532218
4Rogers/Osman06101434233

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Lauren Guarcello
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Nicole Inkrote
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Amy Pham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.80
Amy Dube
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.77
Fran Allen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Anne Warde
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Gina Flanigan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Amanda Loennecker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Erin Mattingly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Dana Lugo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Featherston
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Meeghan Rogers
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Mel Jacobs
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Melanie Radeschi
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Michele Cruz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Pham + Lauren Guarcello8159% games+9.4% vs expected
Michele Cruz + Nicole Inkrote2344% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Guarcello
50W–26L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.32
Nicole Inkrote
33W–25L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%23%77%
3.10
3.5
Amy Pham
54W–43L career · 3 lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.96
3
Amy Dube
8W–18L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Fran Allen
13W–20L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Anne Warde
11W–20L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Gina Flanigan
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
2.68
2.5
Amanda Loennecker
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Erin Mattingly
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Dana Lugo
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Featherston
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Meeghan Rogers
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mel Jacobs
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Melanie Radeschi
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Michele Cruz
5W–13L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.